Ralph Winter, Apr 01, 2006
In this rejoinder, the author first responds to the discussion in Cooper, Froeb, O’Brien, and Vita’s Reply to Winter of a technical point, the relationship between retailer incentives and retailer margins, and then sets out their common ground and remaining differences on the broader theme of theory and evidence in vertical restraints cases. Cooper et al. stated in their original article that a retailer will provide a lower level of effort than is optimal for the manufacturer when the retailer’s margin is small relative to the manufacturer’s margin. The author claimed in his comment on the article that low retail margins do not necessarily lead to inadequate retailer incentives for promotion.
Featured News
Invisalign Maker Must Face Renewed Antitrust Litigation
Oct 5, 2026 by
CPI
Schneider Electric Agrees to Buy PTC in $22.6 Billion Software Deal
Oct 5, 2026 by
CPI
Pesticide Giant Reaches $35 Million Antitrust Deal With FTC
Oct 5, 2026 by
CPI
Meta, TikTok and X Fight UK Watchdog’s Data Demands
Oct 5, 2026 by
CPI
Supreme Court Lets DirecTV Antitrust Case Against Nexstar Move Forward
Oct 5, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton