Ralph Winter, Apr 01, 2006
In this rejoinder, the author first responds to the discussion in Cooper, Froeb, O’Brien, and Vita’s Reply to Winter of a technical point, the relationship between retailer incentives and retailer margins, and then sets out their common ground and remaining differences on the broader theme of theory and evidence in vertical restraints cases. Cooper et al. stated in their original article that a retailer will provide a lower level of effort than is optimal for the manufacturer when the retailer’s margin is small relative to the manufacturer’s margin. The author claimed in his comment on the article that low retail margins do not necessarily lead to inadequate retailer incentives for promotion.
Featured News
EU Probes Meta Over Potential AI Restrictions on WhatsApp
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Netflix’s $72bn Purchase Bid Triggers Concerns Over Consumer Choice
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Judge Formalizes Limits on Google’s Deals With Apple and AI Expansion
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Florida Governor DeSantis Pitches AI Bill of Rights for Residents and Local Governments
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
CFTC Gives Formal Blessing to Spot Trading of Crypto on Registered Exchange
Dec 7, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Intellectual Property
Nov 19, 2025 by
CPI
Dealing in Intellectual Property: IP Justifications and Defenses in Digital Markets Cases
Nov 19, 2025 by
Jennifer Dixton
The Evolving Role of Innovation Theories of Harm in the Antitrust Analysis of Life Science Mergers
Nov 19, 2025 by
Michelle Yost Hale, Matthew D. McDonald & Merrill Stovroff
Who Can Fix It? Antitrust, IP Rights, and the Right to Repair
Nov 19, 2025 by
Rosa M. Morales
Copyright, Antitrust, and the Politics of Generative AI
Nov 19, 2025 by
Daryl Lim