A PYMNTS Company

Supreme Court Lets DirecTV Antitrust Case Against Nexstar Move Forward

 |  October 5, 2026
DirecTV

The US Supreme Court declined to take up Nexstar Media Group’s effort to halt an antitrust lawsuit filed by DirecTV, allowing a legal challenge over television retransmission fees to proceed, according to Quiver Quantitative.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    Subscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The court’s decision leaves intact an appellate ruling that revived DirecTV’s claims against Nexstar and other television-station owners. DirecTV has accused the companies of coordinating behind the scenes to seek artificially elevated fees for permission to carry local broadcast stations, Quiver reported.

    The dispute centers on retransmission fees, which television distributors pay broadcasters for the right to include local stations in their channel lineups. DirecTV alleges that Nexstar and two other station owners worked together in setting their demands rather than negotiating independently, according to Quiver.

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    DirecTV did not agree to pay the contested prices. The resulting carriage dispute caused some stations to become unavailable to roughly 1 million subscribers and contributed to thousands of customer cancellations, according to DirecTV’s allegations as reported by Quiver.

    A federal judge had initially thrown out the lawsuit. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later revived part of the case, ruling in December that DirecTV could pursue claims tied to profits it says it lost as a result of the alleged conduct, Quiver reported.

    Read more: Federal Judge Allows DirecTV Antitrust Case Against Nexstar to Proceed

    Nexstar challenged that conclusion, arguing that DirecTV lacked legal standing because the satellite-TV provider did not actually pay the allegedly inflated retransmission prices. The Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Nexstar’s appeal means the lower-court decision remains in effect and the antitrust litigation can continue, according to Quiver.

    The case puts additional attention on the economics of local television distribution at a time when broadcasters and pay-TV providers continue to clash over carriage costs. Nexstar and its subsidiaries and partners own or operate 265 television stations in 132 U.S. markets, according to Quiver.

    The Supreme Court’s action does not resolve DirecTV’s underlying antitrust allegations. Instead, it allows the company to continue pursuing its claims in the lower courts after Nexstar’s attempt to block the case at the nation’s highest court was unsuccessful.

    Source: Quiver