Below-Cost Pricing and Loyalty-Inducing Discounts: Are They Restrictive and If So, When?
Alberto Heimler, Sep 01, 2005
Abuse of dominance is the area where the divergence between U.S. and EC antitrust enforcement practices is still very significant. In particular, in the European Community, the identification of price abuses is mostly based on the abstract ability to exclude, while in the United States, the emphasis is mainly on visible and tangible effects. Some refinements in the analysis may be necessary in both jurisdictions.
Featured News
Fifth Circuit Upholds Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Against NAR
Sep 10, 2026 by
CPI
Saudi Wealth Fund Weighs Merger of EA and Savvy Games
Sep 10, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Antitrust Regulator Pushes Back on Korean Air Bid to Ease Merger Curbs
Sep 10, 2026 by
CPI
China’s Top Court Steps Up Antitrust Enforcement Push
Sep 10, 2026 by
CPI
US Justice Department Examines Nvidia’s $17 Billion Groq Deal
Sep 10, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – State Attorneys General
Aug 27, 2026 by
CPI
CPI Talks… with Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General of Tennessee
Aug 27, 2026 by
Jonathan Skrmetti
What the Live Nation Jury Instructions Tell Us About California’s Unfair Competition Law
Aug 27, 2026 by
Henry Hauser, Brent Nakamura, Ashley Kaplan, Brian Wang & Cari Jeffries
From Backroom Deals to Public Scrutiny: The Tunney Act’s Past, Present, and Future
Aug 27, 2026 by
Christina M. Black & Ashley A. Locke
Understanding the Fragility of Economic Concentration Through the Principles of Ecology
Aug 27, 2026 by
Alexandra Spring