Spanish oil giant Repsol is currently under investigation by the country’s antitrust authority, the National Commission on Markets and Competition (CNMC), over allegations of abusing its dominant position in the wholesale fuel market. The CNMC contends that Repsol may have engaged in manipulative practices to benefit its own petrol station network, disadvantaging independent service stations in the process.
The CNMC’s probe focuses on the period from March to December 2022, during which it alleges that Repsol manipulated wholesale fuel prices to favor its proprietary service stations. The accusations suggest that the company provided additional fuel discounts to customers using its service stations through applications or loyalty and payment cards. This alleged preferential treatment is seen as an attempt to bolster Repsol’s retail network at the expense of its independent competitors.
Moreover, the CNMC claims that Repsol increased the costs imposed on independent service stations, which are its third-party competitors, to purchase fuel on the wholesale market. This move is perceived as an attempt to hinder the competitiveness of independent fuel station operators by raising their operational expenses.
Related: Spanish Watchdog To Probe Big Tech For Non-Compliance Of The Digital Market Act
The CNMC initiated the investigation following complaints filed by two prominent associations representing the interests of independent fuel station operators. The National Association of Automatic Service Stations and the Association of Independent Hydrocarbon Marketers voiced concerns about Repsol’s alleged anti-competitive practices, prompting the antitrust authority to launch a comprehensive inquiry.
Repsol, a major player in the Spanish energy sector, has yet to respond publicly to the allegations. The company’s actions and decisions during the period under investigation will be thoroughly examined as part of the CNMC’s efforts to ascertain the validity of the claims. If the allegations are substantiated, Repsol could face significant fines and potential corrective measures imposed by the antitrust authority.
Source: Off Shore
Featured News
Google and South Carolina Clash Over State Records Demand
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Telefonica Germany Teams Up with Amazon Web Services to Migrate 5G Customers
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Grants $7.4 Million Settlement in Pork Price-Fixing Case
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Wilson Sonsini Bolsters Antitrust and Competition Practice with Key Partner Returns
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
EU to Scrutinize Telecom Italia’s Network Sale to KKR
May 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Economics of Criminal Antitrust
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Navigating Economic Expert Work in Criminal Antitrust Litigation
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
The Increased Importance of Economics in Cartel Cases
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
A Law and Economics Analysis of the Antitrust Treatment of Physician Collective Price Agreements
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI
Information Exchange In Criminal Antitrust Cases: How Economic Testimony Can Tip The Scales
Apr 19, 2024 by
CPI