This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
EU Raises Antitrust Objections to MMG’s Anglo American Nickel Deal
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Backs Bond Requirement in Paramount-Warner Bros. Antitrust Fight
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
Crowell & Moring Adds DOJ, FTC Veterans to Antitrust Practice
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Weighs Antitrust Flexibility for AI Safety Cooperation
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
OpenAI Challenges Secrecy of Musk Companies’ Apple Deal
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
CPI
The Next Five Years of Computational Antitrust
Sep 16, 2026 by
Thibault Schrepel
When Two AI Agents Talk: A Gap in Detection Capabilities
Sep 16, 2026 by
Alba Ribera Martinez
When Innovation Competition Has No Product Yet: Making General Innovation Competition Operational
Sep 16, 2026 by
Mariateresa Maggiolino
Computational Antitrust for Complex Adaptive Markets
Sep 16, 2026 by
Filip Lubinski