This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
Amazon Accused of Rigging Ad Auctions With Hidden Fees of Up to 250%
Nov 5, 2026 by
CPI
Japan Steps Up Pressure on US Tech Giants Over Security and AI
Nov 5, 2026 by
CPI
Google, Meta and TikTok Sue Over California’s Limits on Digital Algorithms
Nov 5, 2026 by
CPI
Wendy’s Rejects Peltz’s $1.4 Billion Takeover Bid, Adopts Defense Plan
Nov 5, 2026 by
CPI
Bae Kim & Lee Bets on AI and Data Analytics in Antitrust Expansion
Nov 5, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Exclusive Dealing
Oct 25, 2026 by
CPI
Exclusive Dealing Without Exclusivity: Screening Contracts, Loyalty Rebates, and the Limits of Antitrust Tests
Oct 25, 2026 by
David Martimort & Jérôme Pouyet
When Competition for Exclusivity Raises Prices: Rebates, Pricing Rules, and the Insulin Puzzle
Oct 25, 2026 by
Daniel P. O’Brien & Greg Shaffer
Why Leaving the Door Open Can Be (Much) Worse Than Closing It: Share-Based Requirements, Buyer-Specific Costs, and Foreclosure
Oct 25, 2026 by
Zhijun Chen & Greg Shaffer
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI