A PYMNTS Company

Subscribers Sue to Challenge Proposed Paramount-Skydance and Warner Bros. Merger

By  |  May 3, 2026
Paramount

A group of streaming subscribers filed a federal lawsuit Thursday seeking to halt the proposed $110 billion merger involving Paramount, Skydance, and Warner Bros., arguing the deal would reduce competition across the entertainment industry and ultimately harm consumers.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The plaintiffs include three current subscribers to Paramount Global’s Paramount+ service, along with two individuals identified as prospective subscribers. According to Variety, the group alleges the transaction would likely lead to higher subscription costs and fewer viewing choices if the merger moves forward.

    The lawsuit was filed in federal court in San Jose, California, by two Bay Area law firms. Per Variety, the complaint seeks not only to block the proposed Warner Bros. combination but also asks the court to require Skydance Media to divest its ownership of Paramount, which it acquired last year.

    Paramount has indicated it expects the transaction to close sometime in the third quarter, though the deal could still face scrutiny from regulators at either the federal or state level. According to Variety, private antitrust lawsuits challenging major mergers are uncommon and often difficult to win, though successful claims can result in financial settlements for affected consumers.

    Related: Warner Bros. Discovery Shareholders Approve Paramount Skydance Takeover

    The complaint also seeks treble damages under provisions of the Clayton Act, which allows private parties to pursue damages if they can demonstrate harm resulting from anticompetitive business combinations.

    “Skydance’s nontrivial acquisition of Paramount Global and the proposed nontrivial acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery reflect the same strategy of refusing to compete by building better products, investing, innovating, or winning customers through rivalry on the merits, but instead pursuing scale through consolidation that eliminates independent rivals and weakens the competitive constraints that protect consumers,” the suit states.

    Per Variety, the lawsuit also points to previous media industry consolidations — including Disney’s acquisition of Fox and Amazon’s purchase of MGM — as examples of a broader trend toward concentration in Hollywood that the plaintiffs argue is damaging competition and consumer choice.

    Source: Variety