Teva Pharmaceutical Industries has agreed to pay US$1.1 million to settle antitrust claims by buyers of Shire’s ADHD drug Intuniv, who accused Shire and Teva’s predecessor Actavis of delaying the launch of a generic version of the drug through an illegal settlement.
In a motion filed Monday, May 24, in federal court in Boston, the plaintiffs asked US District Judge Allison Burroughs to approve the deal, saying it would provide “substantial relief” to a class of consumers, known as indirect purchasers because they bought Intuniv through intermediaries. Teva first disclosed the settlement in December, but did not reveal its terms.
The company previously reached a US$20 million settlement with a class of direct purchasers, like drug wholesalers and distributors, which has already received preliminary approval. If Burroughs grants both settlement final approval, Teva will exit the litigation.
“We are pleased to move this forward on behalf of the proposed class,” said plaintiffs’ lawyer Conlee Whiteley of Kanner & Whiteley.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Walmex Awaits Antitrust Ruling as Mexican Regulator Probes Alleged Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Crypto.com Sues SEC, Alleging Regulatory Overreach in Crypto Industry
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Elite US Universities Face New Antitrust Suit Over Financial Aid Practices
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Kirkland & Ellis Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner from FTC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
TikTok Hit with Lawsuits from 13 US States and DC
Oct 8, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh