Tim Wu, Dec 20, 2013
Competition law and Intellectual Property have divergent intellectual cultures–the former more pragmatic and experimentalist; the latter influenced by natural law and vested rights. “The US Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis is an intellectual victory for the former approach, one that suggests that antitrust law can and should be used to introduce greater scrutiny of the specific consequences of intellectual property grants…
Featured News
Paramount Wants States to Post $1.9 Billion Bond Over Warner Bros. Deal
Aug 17, 2026 by
CPI
California Bill to Cap Concert Ticket Resale Prices Dies in Senate
Aug 17, 2026 by
CPI
Six Banks Agree to $86.4 Million Deal in Mexican Bond Antitrust Case
Aug 17, 2026 by
CPI
ByteDance Reaches Hollywood Copyright Accord Over AI Tools
Aug 17, 2026 by
CPI
Court Backs Kansas in Nexstar-Tegna Antitrust Fight
Aug 17, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes