On the last day of the ebooks price-fixing trial, Apple and the US Department of Justice issued their closing statements. In one of the largest antitrust cases in recent history, Apple declared that it “did not conspire with a single publisher to fix prices” when it entered the ebooks industry with the launch of its new iPad in 2010. The DOJ’s closing remarks had a very different tone, however, insisting that Apple deliberately capped e-books prices in the tech giant’s policy to require an agency model of pricing from publishers, as opposed to the wholesale pricing model. The case, being tried in US District Court in Manhattan, has been highly publicized. Most recently, reports paint a shaky picture for the DOJ as testimony largely discredited the regulator’s arguments that Apple deliberately required ebooks publishers to use the agency pricing model in order to compete with Amazon.
Featured News
EU Digital Sovereignty Debate Intensifies Over CAIDA’s Scope
Jun 15, 2026 by
CPI
OnlyFans Software Firm Rejects Antitrust Allegations in Data Access Dispute
Jun 15, 2026 by
CPI
Community Resistance Emerges as Major Obstacle to US Data Center Expansion: Report
Jun 15, 2026 by
CPI
UK Moves Toward ‘Australia-Plus’ Social Media Ban for Children Under 16
Jun 15, 2026 by
CPI
Nuvei to Acquire Payoneer in $2.75 Billion Payments Deal
Jun 15, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – (Geo)Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
CPI
Competition Policy in Turbulent Geopolitical Times
May 28, 2026 by
Christophe Carugati & Annabelle Gawer
The New Political Determinants of U.S. Antitrust Policy
May 28, 2026 by
Aziz Z. Huq
The Geopolitical Rewiring of Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Hayane C. Dahmen
Three Strikes Against Political Antitrust
May 28, 2026 by
Nolan McCarty & Sepehr Shahshahani