On the last day of the ebooks price-fixing trial, Apple and the US Department of Justice issued their closing statements. In one of the largest antitrust cases in recent history, Apple declared that it “did not conspire with a single publisher to fix prices” when it entered the ebooks industry with the launch of its new iPad in 2010. The DOJ’s closing remarks had a very different tone, however, insisting that Apple deliberately capped e-books prices in the tech giant’s policy to require an agency model of pricing from publishers, as opposed to the wholesale pricing model. The case, being tried in US District Court in Manhattan, has been highly publicized. Most recently, reports paint a shaky picture for the DOJ as testimony largely discredited the regulator’s arguments that Apple deliberately required ebooks publishers to use the agency pricing model in order to compete with Amazon.
Featured News
South Korean Steelmaker POSCO Expands Supplier Support Pact With Antitrust Regulator
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
FCC’s Carr Criticizes California-Led Bid to Block Paramount-Warner Bros. Discovery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Top Court Upholds Antitrust Powers to Seize Corporate Emails
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Uber Launches $14.8 Billion Bid for Delivery Hero in Landmark Food Delivery Deal
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
EU Orders Google to Open Android and Search Data to Rival AI Services
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Agentic AI & Antitrust
Jul 16, 2026 by
CPI
AI Agents and Collusion: The Two Faces of Agentic AI
Jul 16, 2026 by
Giovanna Massarotto
Agentic AI’s Regulatory Conundrum
Jul 16, 2026 by
Anant Raut
Inter-AI-Agent Competition
Jul 16, 2026 by
Stefan Thomas
Navigating the Increasing Regulatory Scrutiny of AI-Pricing Tools: Competition and Other Emerging Risks
Jul 16, 2026 by
Mark Krotoski & Vinny Sidhu