The US Supreme Court ruled this week that Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company, will not be forced to defend itself against a major, multi-million dollar class action in a 5-4 vote overturning a lower court’s previous decision. According to the Justices, the lawsuit, which accused the cable company of monopolizing the market in Philadelphia, was too “unwieldy” to proceed. The Comcast customers accused the company of colluding with competitors to exchange territories, allegedly ensuring control over the market – claims that Comcast denies. The Court’s opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia explained that the class action failed to meet requirements demonstrating the levels of monetary damages for each of the individual parties of the suit, and that the plaintiffs’ allegations were too broad.
Featured News
FTC Warns Patent-Right Acquisitions Cannot Escape Antitrust Review in Amgen Enbrel Case
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
nVent Bets $1.75 Billion on Data-Center Power Demand
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
Squire Patton Boggs Adds Former FTC Antitrust Lawyer
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
Tacoma Sues Fire-Truck Makers in Expanding US Antitrust Fight
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
California Breaks Off Paramount Talks Over $110 Billion Warner Bros. Deal
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Antipasto
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
“Anti-Monopoly” Antitrust Enforcement: Lessons Learned from the Biden Administration
Aug 24, 2026 by
Diana L. Moss
FTC v. Meta: The Importance of Quantitative Evidence in Antitrust
Aug 24, 2026 by
Dennis Carlton, John A. List, Allan Shampine, Hal Sider & Theresa Sullivan
Competitor Information Exchanges: Reducing Market Uncertainty Is What Matters, Not Level Of Detail
Aug 24, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka, Assimakis Komninos, James Killick & Nina Frie
When Politics Meets Merger Control: 10 Transatlantic Takeaways
Aug 24, 2026 by
Rachel Brandenburger