LendingClub, the online lender that was once a favorite of Wall Street investors, saw its stock hit a record low on Wednesday, April 25, after it faced allegations by regulators in the US that it was adding on hidden fees and charging borrowers even after they no longer had a loan with the company.
Bloomberg reported the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) contends the company’s behavior violated federal laws that protect consumers from deceptive and unfair practices. As a result of the FTC complaint, Bloomberg noted the online lender’s stock fell 14% to $2.80 a share, off 32 percent so far this year. Since its initial public offering, LendingClub’s stock has declined 80%.
“Many consumers are forced to pay overdraft fees, while other consumers are unable to pay other bills because they do not have access to the money that defendants improperly withdrew,” the FTC said in its lawsuit, which Bloomberg reported was filed in San Francisco.
The FTC contends LendingClub vowed not to slap borrowers with hidden fees even though it took hundreds of dollars — and in some cases thousands of dollars — in fees from the loans. The FTC said LendingClub also claimed investors backed their loans, even though it knew borrowers would never get a loan, which prevented them from borrowing from another lender.
Additionally, the FTC contends that LendingClub even withdrew double payments from consumers’ accounts and charged those that no longer owed any money on their loans.
“This case demonstrates the importance to consumers of having truthful information from lenders, including online marketplace lenders,” said Reilly Dolan, acting director of the FTC’s Consumer Protection unit. “Stopping this kind of conduct will help consumers make informed choices about loan offers.”
In response to the lawsuit, LendingClub told Bloomberg it was disappointed with the lawsuit. “In our decade-plus history, we have helped more than 2 million people access low-cost credit and have co-founded two associations that raised the bar for transparency,” the company said. “The allegations cannot be reconciled with this longstanding record of consumer satisfaction that’s reflected in every available objective metric.”
Full Content: PYMNTS
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
UFC Reaches $375 Million Settlement in Antitrust Case
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Brazilian Architecture Council Convicted of Antitrust Violations
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Bipartisan Bill Seeks to Ban Chinese AI Software from US Government Devices
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Senators Call for Investigation into RealPage Algorithm’s Impact on Military Housing Costs
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
ECB Seeks Faster Digital Euro Legislation Amid US Stablecoin Push
Feb 6, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – International Criminal Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
CPI
The Antitrust Division’s Recent Work to Combat International Cartels
Jan 23, 2025 by
Emma Burnham & Benjamin Christenson
Information Sharing: The New Frontier of U.S. Antitrust Enforcement
Jan 23, 2025 by
Brian P. Quinn, Casey Kovarik & Michael Tubach
The Key Role of Guidelines on Exchanges of Information Among Competitors and the Divergent Transatlantic Paths
Jan 23, 2025 by
Rosa Abrantes-Metz & Albert Metz
Leniency, Whistleblowers, and Compliance
Jan 23, 2025 by
Richard Powers, Tara O’Malley & Cory Gordon