A Minneapolis federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit against Supervalu and C&S Wholesale Grocers, ruling that the two largest grocery wholesalers in the US did not hamper competition in the market with their 2003 agreement over distribution regions. The agreement, which included some non-compete clauses, pertained to a swap of distribution regions in the Midwest and New England. The two were sued in 2009 by two supermarkets, but US Distrit Judge Ann Montgomery has ruled that the supermarkets failed to prove enough evidence of “unreasonable restraint of trade” resulting from the deal.
Featured News
FTC Warns Patent-Right Acquisitions Cannot Escape Antitrust Review in Amgen Enbrel Case
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
nVent Bets $1.75 Billion on Data-Center Power Demand
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
Squire Patton Boggs Adds Former FTC Antitrust Lawyer
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
Tacoma Sues Fire-Truck Makers in Expanding US Antitrust Fight
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
California Breaks Off Paramount Talks Over $110 Billion Warner Bros. Deal
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Antipasto
Aug 24, 2026 by
CPI
“Anti-Monopoly” Antitrust Enforcement: Lessons Learned from the Biden Administration
Aug 24, 2026 by
Diana L. Moss
FTC v. Meta: The Importance of Quantitative Evidence in Antitrust
Aug 24, 2026 by
Dennis Carlton, John A. List, Allan Shampine, Hal Sider & Theresa Sullivan
Competitor Information Exchanges: Reducing Market Uncertainty Is What Matters, Not Level Of Detail
Aug 24, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka, Assimakis Komninos, James Killick & Nina Frie
When Politics Meets Merger Control: 10 Transatlantic Takeaways
Aug 24, 2026 by
Rachel Brandenburger