A federal lawyer heart two hours of oral arguments Friday from a lawyer representing two union health plans, accusing drug makers of fraud for coupons offered to consumers on brand name drugs. While the drug companies motioned to dismiss the two class actions, US District Judge Paul Oetken pressed the lawyer to explain how the coupons violated the law; according to reports, the coupons are accused to be “undisclosed kickbacks” and “commercial bribery” in violation of antitrust law intended to keep consumers on brand name drugs, often more expensive than their generic counterparts. According to the plaintiffs, the drug makers are utilizing coupons to preserve their market shares. According to reports, the Judge did not seem entirely convinced of the claims made.
Featured News
India Defends Global Turnover Antitrust Rule as Apple Challenges Multibillion-Dollar Fine
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
China Probes Food Delivery Platforms Over Competition Practices
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
Paramount Urges Congress to Scrutinize Netflix Deal for Warner Bros. Discovery Assets
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
X Claims Music Publishers Colluded to Enforce Costly Licensing Terms
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
EU Issues Guidance to Clarify Enforcement of Foreign Subsidies Rules
Jan 11, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 16, 2025 by
CPI
Learning from Divergence: The Role of Cross-Country Comparisons in the Evaluation of the DMA
Dec 16, 2025 by
Federico Bruni
New Regulatory Tools for the EU Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Foreign Subsidies Regulation
Dec 16, 2025 by
Ioannis Kokkoris
“Suite Dreams”: Market Definition and Complementarity in the Digital Age
Dec 16, 2025 by
Romain Bizet & Matteo Foschi
The Interaction Between Competition Policy and Consumer Protection: Institutional Design, Behavioral Insights, and Emerging Challenges in Digital Markets
Dec 16, 2025 by
Alessandra Tonazzi