A PYMNTS Company

US: North Carolina bans most favored nation clauses in healthcare contracts

By  |  May 6, 2013
US: North Carolina bans most favored nation clauses in healthcare contracts

North Carolina’s legislature has enacted a bill that bans so-called most favored nation clauses within healthcare contracts. The law, entitled “Freedom to Negotiate Health Care Rates,” has yet to be signed by the governor. The bill prohibits a much-debated topic of the practice of health insurance companies entering into agreements many consider to be anticompetitive, in which healthcare providers are barred from doing business with competing insurers. According to reports, the bill aims to allow hospitals to negotiate rates with insurers, and prohibits insurers from forcing hospitals to charge more when working with rival insurance companies. The bill comes about a month after Michigan passed similar legislation, which resulted in the US Department of Justice motioning to dismiss an antitrust suit against health insurance giant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan after the DOJ accused BCBS of stifling competition with the MFN clauses. Ohio also has a ban on MFN clauses.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Full Content: National Law Review

    Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.