Nov 05, 2010
In their thoughtful article, Douglas Ginsburg and Joshua Wright make five key points towards enhancing cartel deterrence through increased penalties: Collusion is under-deterred and there is little risk of over-deterrence; Corporate penalties cannot be raised to a level sufficient to deter collusion; Individual penalties should be used more aggressively, with an emphasis on debarment; Corporate penalties should not be increased; and Corporate penalties should not be assessed when a company was not negligent. This discussion considers each of these points and then concludes with some additional suggestions.
Featured News
Google Revamps Android App Store Rules, Cuts Fees Amid Global Antitrust Pressure
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
White House Reviews Tencent’s Gaming Stakes as Trump Prepares for China Visit
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Charles River Associates Adds Senior Consultant to Antitrust Practice
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ Investigates Major Fertilizer Producers Over Possible Price Coordination
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
NY Bill Would Bar AI Chatbots From Providing ‘Substantive’ Medical or Legal Responses
Mar 4, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece