Decision-Making Powers and Institutional Design in Competition Cases: The Brazilian Experience
Ana Paula Martinez, Mariana Tavares de Araujo, Sep 11, 2014
This article discusses the experience of Brazil regarding institutional design and decision-making powers and Brazil’s efforts to enhance its convergence to international best practices, thereby improving Brazil’s competition law enforcement. We describe the history of Brazil’s competition law and policy system, and go on to discuss the benefits, as well as the efficiency and productivity costs, that result from the bifurcation of prosecutorial and adjudicative roles within the administrative system; warn that independency for a competition agency can be a two-edged sword; and emphasize the need to consider resources when designing and implementing merger and control systems.
Featured News
Meta Hit With $25 Billion Penalty Over Facebook Privacy Claims
Oct 21, 2026 by
CPI
Keurig Faces Antitrust Trial After Federal Court Rejects Legal Challenge
Oct 21, 2026 by
CPI
Spain Opens Antitrust Investigation Into Exolum Over Pricing and Market Access
Oct 21, 2026 by
CPI
OpenAI Strikes Google Cloud Deal in Push Beyond Microsoft
Oct 21, 2026 by
CPI
Getty Images Files for Bankruptcy as $533M Restructuring Paves Way for Private Ownership
Oct 21, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – EU Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
CPI
In Praise of Theories of Benefits
Oct 19, 2026 by
Cyril Hariton & Pierre Regibeau
Closing the Efficiencies Gap
Oct 19, 2026 by
Kasia Czapracka & Marika Harjula
Analysis of Dynamic Trade-Offs Under the New Guidelines: Would Cases Like Amazon/Irobot Turn Out Differently?
Oct 19, 2026 by
Oliver Latham, Sam Marden, Saul Mendelsohn & Serge Moresi
Exploitative Portfolio Effects In EU Merger Control: From Mars/Kellanova to the Draft Merger Guidelines
Oct 19, 2026 by
Niels Baeten, Danette Chan & Elizabeth Malik