Orley Ashenfelter, Daniel Hosken, Matthew Weinberg, Apr 30, 2009
The challenge of effective merger enforcement is tremendous. U.S. antitrust agencies must, by statute, quickly forecast the competitive effects of mergers that occur in virtually every sector of the economy to determine if mergers can proceed. Surprisingly, given the complexity of the regulators task, there is remarkably little empirical evidence on the effects of mergers to guide regulators. This paper describes the need for retrospective analysis of past mergers in building an empirical basis for antitrust enforcement, and provides guidance on the key measurement issues researchers confront in estimating the price effects of mergers. We also describe how evidence from merger retrospectives can be used to evaluate the economic models that predict the competitive effects of mergers.
Featured News
Judge Halts New York Ban on Algorithmic Rent-Setting Software
Sep 30, 2026 by
CPI
Zillow Must Face Agent Antitrust Claims After Judge Rejects Dismissal Bid
Sep 30, 2026 by
CPI
California Expands Antitrust Law With New Powers to Target Monopolies
Sep 30, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Antitrust Watchdog Moves Toward Sanctions Against Korean Air, Asiana
Sep 30, 2026 by
CPI
RealPage Wins Preliminary Injunction Against New York Algorithmic Rent-Setting Ban
Sep 30, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton