This article examines some of the ways in which the states have contributed to important developments in the antitrust laws, both historically and in the present. Although they are resource constrained, the states have made a significant impact on the overall direction of the antitrust laws, by bringing a consumer-centric analysis to anticompetitive conduct and legislation. While the states often work cooperatively with the federal enforcers, there are many examples throughout history, and recently, where states have acted independent of the federal agencies. The article concludes that concurrent jurisdiction of the antitrust laws is beneficial and produces the best outcomes for consumers.
Featured News
Tyson, Cargill Challenge Class-Action Ruling in Cattle Price-Fixing Case
Oct 13, 2026 by
CPI
Kimberly-Clark’s $40 Billion Kenvue Takeover Clears EU Antitrust Review
Oct 13, 2026 by
CPI
Debevoise Strengthens Washington Team With Senior DOJ Hire
Oct 13, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Moves Toward Airline Mega-Merger With Limited Restrictions
Oct 13, 2026 by
CPI
Microsoft President Says UK Is Best Placed to Lead AI Regulation
Oct 13, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – National Security
Sep 22, 2026 by
CPI
National Security in U.S. Antitrust Enforcement: Toward a More Disciplined Framework
Sep 22, 2026 by
Rod Rosenstein & Timothy Finley
The Department of War’s M&A Review Guidance: What Companies in the Defense Industry Need to Know
Sep 22, 2026 by
Eric Stocking & Paul Ney
National Security, Resilience and the Boundaries of Merger Control
Sep 22, 2026 by
Beatriz Marques
National Security and Competition: Building Resilient Telecommunications Networks
Sep 22, 2026 by
Roslyn Layton