Google has declared its commitment to defend users of generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems within its Google Cloud and Workspace platforms if they face accusations of intellectual property violations. This decision aligns Google with other tech giants like Microsoft and Adobe, which have also made similar pledges.
In recent years, major technology companies such as Google have been making substantial investments in generative AI and are in a fierce race to incorporate it into their products. However, these advancements have not come without controversy, as prominent writers, illustrators, and other copyright owners have initiated several lawsuits. They claim that both the use of their creative work to train AI systems and the content generated by these systems infringe upon their intellectual property rights, reported Reuters.
Google’s pledge of indemnity, as disclosed on Thursday, comes with one crucial caveat: it does not apply if users “intentionally create or use generated output to infringe the rights of others.” This stipulation aims to balance the protection of legitimate users with safeguarding against misuse.
Read more: Google And OpenAI Disagree On Government Oversight Of AI
It is worth noting that the recent wave of lawsuits surrounding generative AI has primarily targeted the companies responsible for these systems, including Google, rather than individual end users. This strategic choice by plaintiffs reflects the belief that the companies should be held accountable for any potential intellectual property violations stemming from their technology.
AI defendants, on the other hand, have consistently argued that the use of training data obtained from the internet to train their systems falls under the umbrella of “fair use” as defined by U.S. copyright law. This ongoing legal debate remains at the heart of many of the cases.
As the utilization of generative AI continues to grow and evolve, it is clear that the technology’s impact on intellectual property rights will remain a topic of great interest, both within the tech industry and the legal sphere. With Google’s recent announcement to stand by its users, the battle over the boundaries of generative AI’s fair use may find a renewed focal point.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Uruguayan Antitrust Scrutiny Puts Major Meatpacking Deal Between Marfrig and Minerva on Hold
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Alaska Airlines Seeks Dismissal of Consumer Lawsuit Over $1.9 Billion Hawaiian Airlines Buy
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Idaho Attorney General Orders Split of Kootenai Health and Syringa Hospital
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Court Rejects T-Mobile’s Appeal Bid in Antitrust Case Over Sprint Merger
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Google Requests Judge, Not Jury, to Decide on Antitrust Case
May 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Mapping Antitrust onto Digital Ecosystems
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystems and Competition Law: A Law and Political Economy Approach
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Ecosystem Theories of Harm: What is Beyond the Buzzword?
May 9, 2024 by
CPI
Open Ecosystems: Benefits, Challenges, and Implications for Antitrust
May 9, 2024 by
CPI