A PYMNTS Company

Meta to Charge Advertisers Fee in EU Markets With Digital Taxes

 |  March 10, 2026

Meta Platforms will begin charging advertisers a new location-based fee of between 2% and 5% to help offset digital service taxes imposed by several countries, according to Reuters. The policy mirrors similar steps previously taken by other major technology companies such as Google, owned by Alphabet, and Amazon.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The U.S. social media company said in a post on its website that the fee will apply to image and video advertisements delivered across its platforms. This includes ads connected to WhatsApp click-to-message campaigns and marketing messages paired with advertisements. The new charges are scheduled to take effect on July 1.

    According to Reuters, the location fee will also cover other government-imposed levies tied to digital advertising services. Until now, the company said it had absorbed those costs itself. “Until now, Meta has covered these additional costs. These changes are part of Meta’s ongoing effort to respond to the evolving regulatory landscape and align with industry standards,” the company said in the blog post.

    The company explained that the fee will be determined by where the ad audience is located rather than the physical location of the advertiser’s business, per Reuters. Businesses purchasing ads will therefore pay an additional amount that corresponds to the digital tax rate in the country where the advertisement is shown.

    Read more: EU Court Adviser Recommends Dismissing Meta’s Appeals in Antitrust Data Dispute

    We’d love to be your preferred source for news.

    Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!

    Meta identified six countries where the new charges will apply: the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Spain, Austria and Turkey. The fee will be set at 2% for the United Kingdom, 3% for France, Italy and Spain, and 5% for Austria and Turkey, according to Reuters.

    The company illustrated how the fee would work in practice. “If you deliver $100 in ads to Italy, where there is a 3% location fee, you will be charged $100 (ad delivery), plus $3 (location fee), for $103 total,” Meta wrote. “Note that any applicable VAT will be calculated on top of the total amount.”

    Digital service taxes are designed to collect revenue from large technology firms based on the income they generate within individual countries. According to Reuters, several European nations introduced these taxes over the past several years in response to concerns that major technology companies generate significant revenue locally but pay relatively little tax on profits in those markets.

    France was among the first to introduce such a tax in 2019, followed by other countries including Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. The levies typically apply as a percentage of revenue earned from digital services such as advertising.

    The policy has been a point of tension between the United States and some European governments. According to Reuters, U.S. officials have argued that digital services taxes disproportionately affect American technology companies and have warned of possible retaliatory measures.

    The administration of President Donald Trump previously threatened to respond to the taxes by imposing fees on European companies or restricting their access to the U.S. market, per Reuters.

    Meta’s new fee structure shifts the burden of those taxes from the company to advertisers purchasing space on its platforms, aligning its approach with practices already adopted by other major technology firms facing similar regulatory costs.

    Source: Reuters