This month, the Antitrust Chronicle® (AC) addresses recent developments on Single Firm/Unilateral conduct. A rich variety of articles from Europe, the U.S., India and Mexico illustrate the latest changes to the notion of anticompetitive effects under article 102 TFUE, the legal tests applicable in section 2 cases, enforcement rules in the energy and telecom sectors in Europe, and more. Single firm conducts have always been the most challenging cases for competition agencies and tribunals, especially so in jurisdictions with young competition regimes. Not only is there a lack of consensus on how to analyze these cases or what test to apply in order to determine a case of abuse, but the fast moving markets in industries such as telecom and the Internet also render it particularly difficult to ascertain when a conduct is perfectly legitimate and when it?s harming consumers.
Featured News
Intel Fined by India’s Competition Regulator Over Discriminatory Warranty Policy
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Mexico Blocks Visa’s Bid for Prosa in Debut Move by New Antitrust Authority
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Probes Major Flour Producers Over Alleged Six-Year Price-Fixing Scheme
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
DOJ & Ohio Attorney General File Antitrust Suit Against OhioHealth Over Contract Practices
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Washington Moves to Set Rules for AI That Acts on Its Own
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Behavioral Economics
Feb 22, 2026 by
CPI
Behavioral Antitrust in 2026
Feb 22, 2026 by
Maurice Stucke
Behavioral Economics in Competition Policy: Going Beyond Inertia and Framing Effects
Feb 22, 2026 by
Annemieke Tuinstra & Richard May
Agreeing to Disagree in Antitrust
Feb 22, 2026 by
Jorge Padilla
Recognizing What’s Around the Corner: Merger Control, Capabilities, and the New Nature of Potential Competition
Feb 22, 2026 by
Magdalena Kuyterink & David J. Teece