Deutsche Boerse and Nasdaq have come under scrutiny as the European Union (EU) launches an investigation into potential antitrust violations within the financial derivatives sector, according to Reuters.
On Tuesday, Deutsche Boerse, the German stock exchange operator, confirmed that its offices had been searched as part of the investigation. A spokesperson for the company added that they were fully cooperating with the authorities but refrained from providing further details, stating, “We do not comment on ongoing investigations.”
Similarly, a representative for Nasdaq disclosed that the American financial services company had also been approached in connection with the probe. While Nasdaq did not specify which country or countries were involved, its Stockholm-based spokesperson emphasized that the company was aware of the investigation and was committed to cooperating fully with the European Commission. “Nasdaq is committed to fully cooperate with the European Commission and support the relevant authorities with the investigation,” the spokesperson said, per Reuters.
Related: EU Regulators May Proceed Without Seeking Feedback on EEX-Nasdaq Remedies
The European Commission, which oversees competition rules across the EU, confirmed on Monday that it had conducted unannounced inspections at financial services companies in two EU member states. While it did not name the firms involved or provide specifics about the number of companies under investigation, these inspections are often the first step in probing potential antitrust violations. According to the EU, these surprise inspections are not a confirmation of guilt but serve to collect evidence in cases of suspected anticompetitive behavior.
Euronext, a major European stock exchange operator with markets in cities like Paris and Amsterdam, issued a statement distancing itself from the investigation. The company clarified that it was not subject to any inspections or investigations by the European Commission.
While there is no legal deadline to complete the investigation, if violations of antitrust laws are discovered, the companies involved could face formal charges and substantial fines. The investigation’s focus on the financial derivatives market highlights the EU’s continued efforts to regulate competition within key sectors of the financial industry.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
X May Be Excluded from EU’s Strict Tech Rules, Sources Suggest
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
G7 Targets Competitive Imbalances in Semiconductor Industry
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh