In a recent interview on CBS News’ “60 Minutes,” Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan addressed the rising inflation and attributed significant responsibility to corporate practices. According to Fox, Khan emphasized that an increasing concentration of market power among a few corporations is leading to price hikes that hurt consumers.
During her discussion with Lesley Stahl, who reported on a town hall meeting featuring Khan and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Khan stated, “Too often fewer and fewer companies are controlling more and more of the market.” She explained that this concentration allows companies to raise prices without fear of competition. “There’s no doubt that the pandemic and the war led prices to soar,” she noted, but pointed out that prices have not fallen in line with easing supply chain pressures. Per Fox, she observed that some corporate executives have even praised inflation during earnings calls, suggesting it benefits their profit margins.
Khan defended the FTC’s role in scrutinizing proposed mergers and acquisitions, asserting that such actions must ensure market competitiveness. “Even if those efficiencies arise, if the company’s not checked by competition, it won’t have an incentive to pass those benefits on to the consumer,” she remarked, highlighting the potential risks of unchecked corporate power.
Related: FTC’s Lina Khan Lauds Corporate Focus on Antitrust in Deal-Making
Stahl raised concerns about the chilling effect of the FTC’s investigations on merger proposals, to which Khan acknowledged that companies sometimes choose to abandon deals amid scrutiny. “That’s right,” she affirmed, reiterating the importance of maintaining a competitive marketplace.
When asked about the potential for the FTC’s actions to destabilize the economy, Khan expressed a balanced view. “Of course we have to worry,” she stated. However, she also warned that allowing companies to act recklessly without accountability poses its own risks, potentially leading to significant economic disruption. According to Fox, Khan concluded by emphasizing that the FTC and DOJ only investigate a small fraction of proposed deals—about 2% or 3%—illustrating the agency’s focused approach to maintaining market integrity.
Source: Fox
Featured News
Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawsuit Against Ivy League Over Athletic Scholarships
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
FTC and DOJ Revamp Merger Guidelines to Identify Illegal Transactions More Efficiently
Oct 11, 2024 by
CPI
US Consumer Watchdog Eyes Expansion of ‘Junk Fee’ Crackdown Ahead of 2024 Election
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Brazil Proposes Reform to Competition Law Targeting Big Tech
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Meta Enhances User Data Control, Resolving German Antitrust Dispute
Oct 10, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh