Robert Kenny, Dec 20, 2012
Plurality rules have long been used to ensure diverse ownership of media, with the expectation that this leads to the availability of diverse news coverage to citizens, which in turn supports democratic discourse. In several countries there is current debate as to whether plurality rules need to be strengthened, and particularly so in the United Kingdom, where News’ bid for Sky and the subsequent phone-hacking scandal have brought plurality issues to the fore. However, fundamental developments in the market mean that the costs of plurality interventions are rising, and the benefits are falling. This paper examines how the costs and benefits of plurality regulation are changing, using the United Kingdom as a case study.
Featured News
Warren, Banks Call for FTC Investigation of Fire Truck Market Concentration
Jul 21, 2026 by
CPI
Metro Bank Weighs £2 Billion Bid for Aldermore
Jul 21, 2026 by
CPI
EU Antitrust Probe Deepens as Cemex Receives Formal Objections
Jul 21, 2026 by
CPI
Google Settles Russian Antitrust Case, Opens Android to Rival Search Services
Jul 21, 2026 by
CPI
Kentucky Settles Antitrust Claims Against Greystar in RealPage Rent-Setting Case
Jul 21, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Antitrust Compliance
Jul 20, 2026 by
CPI
Your Antitrust Compliance Program: A Strong Voice in Your Defense
Jul 20, 2026 by
Joe Murphy
Antitrust Compliance for the AI Pricing Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Alejandra Uria & Andre Geverola
Race to Report: Antitrust Leniency in the Whistleblower Era
Jul 20, 2026 by
Brian R. Faerstein & Nicole H. Sprinzen
Antitrust-By-Design: Competition Compliance in Digital Markets
Jul 20, 2026 by
Marcos Drummond Malvar, Gabriela Costa Carvalho Forsman & Luciana Mendes