Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, has been ordered to pay $25 billion to New Mexico over allegations that it misled users about privacy protections on its social networking platform, according to an Associated Press report published by the Indianapolis Business Journal on Wednesday.
The decision represents a substantial financial penalty for the technology company and highlights the legal risks associated with how social media platforms communicate their data practices to consumers.
According to the Indianapolis Business Journal report, the case centers on deceptive representations about user privacy on Facebook.
The ruling puts renewed attention on the obligations of major technology companies to provide accurate information about how they handle personal data. It also underscores the potential financial consequences when courts determine that companies have misrepresented their privacy practices.
Cambridge Analytica Case Drives Record Penalty
The judgment follows a September jury verdict finding more than 43 million violations of New Mexico’s consumer protection laws, according to the Associated Press. State District Judge Francis J. Mathew determined the financial penalty after attorneys for both sides presented sharply different assessments of the appropriate amount.
The dispute traces back to the Cambridge Analytica scandal, in which personal information associated with approximately 87 million Facebook profiles was obtained through a third-party application. The political consulting firm subsequently used Facebook data to support targeted advertising during the 2016 U.S. presidential election, according to the AP report.
New Mexico’s legal team maintained that Facebook had given consumers inaccurate assurances about control over their personal information. Prosecutors also challenged the company’s public statements about its approach to harmful content and misinformation.
The state sought between $35 billion and $40 billion in penalties. Meta’s attorneys countered that a penalty exceeding approximately $3.4 billion would be excessive and vulnerable to constitutional challenges, according to AP reporting.
Meta Challenges Findings and Prepares Appeal
Meta has disputed the state’s interpretation of the evidence, arguing that prosecutors did not establish that New Mexico residents suffered actual harm from the company’s statements.
The company also challenged the methodology used to calculate violations, particularly the inclusion of people who may have encountered Facebook’s public representations without necessarily using the platform.
Meta has indicated that it intends to appeal the jury’s verdict. A successful challenge to the violation count could reduce the company’s ultimate financial liability.
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
Related: Meta Faces EU Complaint From German Publishers Over Content Access
According to the Associated Press, Meta representatives did not immediately provide a response to a request for comment on the $25 billion penalty.
New Mexico Pursues Separate Legal Strategy
The judgment follows an $18 billion multistate settlement reached in August involving 48 states. New Mexico declined to participate, choosing instead to continue its own litigation against Meta. Florida also remained outside that agreement.
New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez described the judgment as an important demonstration of states’ ability to challenge the conduct of powerful technology companies.
Under New Mexico law, money collected through penalties for consumer protection violations is directed toward public education. Torrez said the proceeds from the Meta judgment would benefit the state’s education system, although an appeals process could delay any payment.
The state is also pursuing a court order intended to prevent similar conduct in the future, according to the AP.
Financial and Regulatory Implications
The $25 billion judgment is five times the $5 billion penalty imposed on Facebook by the Federal Trade Commission in 2019, making the New Mexico decision an especially significant development in the company’s history of privacy-related litigation.
The outcome of an appeal remains uncertain. Beyond the immediate financial exposure, the case raises questions about how broadly consumer protection laws can be applied to public statements made by digital platforms and how courts should calculate penalties when alleged deception reaches large audiences.
Source: IBJ
Add as Preferred Source