March 2026
Share of Wallet: Amazon vs. Walmart

Consumer Wallet Reset: How Amazon Wins Discretionary Spend and Walmart Holds Necessities

As household budgets tighten, the two retail giants are fighting over a smaller slice of consumer spending. While Amazon is winning the battle for nice-to-haves, Walmart is locking down the essentials. The divide is reshaping the balance of power in retail.

Get Unlimited Access
Complete the form below for free, unlimited access to all our Data Studies, Trackers, and PYMNTS Intelligence reports.

Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Over the past few years, shoppers have been tightening their belts, spending less on retail shopping and more on essentials like rent and healthcare. That shift spells sobering news for retail giants Amazon and Walmart. With the overall retail pie getting smaller, the scrum for each slice is heating up.

    Nothing shows this battle more clearly than the holiday season. The last three months of 2025 accounted for about 27% of all retail sales for the year. Amazon, for its part, continued to gain share from October through December, achieving record-breaking results. But the boost isn’t coming from essentials. Instead, categories like clothing and electronics are fueling its gains.

    Meanwhile, Walmart has struggled to grow its market share, both during the holiday rush and throughout the rest of the year. Amid Amazon’s gains, Walmart has seen its hold on nice-to-have categories slip away. At the same time, the company’s share of grocery spending keeps growing, and its share of retail overall has held remarkably steady.

    Using data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), the U.S. Census Bureau and recent earnings reports, PYMNTS Intelligence estimated how the two companies compare in their roles in retail overall. Our findings show that Amazon’s strong growth has been fueled by discretionary categories, while Walmart has held ground thanks to its lead in food and beverage.

    These are just some of the insights detailed in “Consumer Wallet Reset: How Amazon Wins Discretionary Spend and Walmart Holds Necessities,” the latest installment of the PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive Share of Wallet: Amazon vs. Walmart series. This edition examines consumers’ retail spending and each retailer’s performance at the close of 2025.

    Consumer Retail Spending

    Consumers are spending less on goods and more on services.

    Retail’s share of overall consumer spending peaked in 2021 and 2022 but has since fallen off. By the final quarter of 2025, it had dropped 9% from three years prior, to 30.8% from 34.3%.

    Conversely, spending on services is gaining ground. During that same period, spending on healthcare, housing and financial services increased.1 Notably, these increases tend to be concentrated in essential categories. Spending on recreational services held basically steady during that three-year span.

    Retail remains the largest category by a considerable margin. Still, its lead is shrinking.

    In general, retail spending is traditionally the strongest during the last three months of the year, when consumers do their holiday shopping. Last year, the quarter accounted for 27% of total retail sales. The category mix in these final months generally reflects year-round trends.

    Where Q4 spending differs from year-round patterns, the changes tend to be gradual rather than abrupt. It seems that the holiday surge amplifies existing trends rather than creating new ones.

    Discretionary retail categories are gaining share.

    As retail’s overall share of consumer spending declines, discretionary categories represent a larger portion of shoppers’ retail spending. Sales of gas, autos and building materials for home renovations have dropped. Building materials’ share fell by 9% compared to the 2019 average, and gas decreased by 14%.

    By contrast, spending on electronics and personal care rose. Specifically, health and personal care’s share of retail spending is up about 14%. Hobby goods’ share has grown 13% and furniture’s by 12%. These categories have shown gradual but steady share gains over the last few years.

    Additionally, discretionary categories have captured a larger share of year-end spend compared to the pre-COVID pandemic baseline. This growth, both in Q4 and year-round, is promising for platforms positioned to capture demand for nonessential products.

    Amazon’s Growth

    Amazon is seizing on the growth of discretionary retail categories, driving record-breaking share gains.

    In Q4, Amazon captured its highest-ever share of total consumer retail spending, 11.1%. Its share of overall consumer spending tied with its Q4 2024 record of 4.6%. In 2025, there was less of a difference than in previous years between the Q4 peak and the year-round performance. It seems that Amazon’s gains throughout the year are making the holiday season boost a little less significant.

    Of course, Amazon’s hold on holiday spending is not to be underestimated. PYMNTS Intelligence research from last November found that 72% of Black Friday shoppers—or 49% of all consumers—made a purchase from Amazon during the sales holiday.

    Amazon’s growth was fueled by the specific discretionary categories that have been gaining ground across retail overall. In 2025, its share of consumer spend for hobby items spiked to 35%, a 69% increase from pre-COVID levels in 2019. Its share of electronics spending rose to 32% from 23%. Its share of clothing and furniture more than doubled. For health and personal care, it more than tripled.

    Grocery, however, remains a weaker category for Amazon, with the eCommerce giant capturing only 3%. That figure has held steady since 2022, up one percentage point from pre-COVID levels in 2019. So while the company keeps gaining ground in nonessential categories, it is comparatively weak in essentials.

    Needs Versus Wants

    While Amazon’s volatile growth comes from nice-to-haves, Walmart sees steady strength in necessities.

    While Amazon’s share of U.S. retail spending has crept upward over the years with sharp spikes in Q4, Walmart’s has held steady, remaining roughly constant year to year and quarter to quarter. The company remains a mainstay but has not been able to win share either in retail or overall consumer spending.

    Grocery is where the big box chain has increased its share over time. In 2025, its captured share of consumer food and beverage spending was up 13% compared to 2019. By contrast, the company has lost ground in discretionary categories such as clothing, electronics and hobby goods.

    Amazon has shown more variation than Walmart from quarter to quarter, but almost always posts stronger growth year over year. Walmart’s changes have been comparatively slower and steadier.

    Delving deeper into those changes in share of discretionary spending, Amazon has seen steady increases over the last few years, with growth consistently concentrated in Q4. Walmart, meanwhile, has seen a gradual slide. These trends further demonstrate that consumers are turning to Amazon more for nice-to-haves and to Walmart for the bare necessities.

    Read More

    PYMNTS Intelligence is the leading provider of information on the consumer trends driving innovation in consumer finance, digital payments and financial inclusion. To stay up to date, subscribe to our newsletters and read our in-depth reports.

    Methodology

    Consumer Wallet Reset: How Amazon Wins Discretionary Spend and Walmart Holds Necessities” is the latest installment of the PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive Share of Wallet: Amazon vs. Walmart series. The report is based on data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), the U.S. Census Bureau and Amazon and Walmart’s earnings reports. It examines consumers’ retail spending and each retailer’s performance at the close of 2026.


    1. The BEA’s definition of “financial services” includes charges, fees and commissions collected by banks, insurers, investment companies and other financial institutions, but excludes credit card interest and mortgage interest.

    About

    PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists includes leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multi-lingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
    Lynnley Browning: Managing Editor
    Yvonni Markaki: SVP, Head of Analytics
    Ignacio Marquez: Sr. Research Analyst
    Franco Coraggio: Research Analyst

    We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions or comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email us at feedback@pymnts.com.

    Disclaimer

    The Share of Wallet: Amazon vs. Walmart Series may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EXCLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
    PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES, SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
    Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.