Deal Fatigue Special Report

Intrigue or Fatigue? Amid Crowded Deals Landscape, Financial Lifestyle Drives Consumers’ Black Friday Interest

November 2024

Black Friday is almost here, but are seemingly infinite sales events making the classic holiday shopping extravaganza lose its appeal? Discover why some consumers will pounce on deals while others will tune them out.

Get Unlimited Access
Complete the form below for free, unlimited access to all our Data Studies, Trackers, and MonitorEdge reports.

Thank you for registering. Please confirm your email to view all our Trackers.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    Consumers are gearing up for one of the holiday shopping season’s main events: Black Friday. This time, the critical sales day may have lost some of its novelty. More than one-third of consumers said they are being bombarded with more deals events throughout this year than last.

    This proliferation of deals events presents both opportunities and challenges. The abundance of sales can dilute their appeal, making “special” events less special. Yet economic pressures make these events essential for many shoppers.

    To understand how these factors shape consumers’ sales shopping behaviors, this PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive report surveyed 2,585 consumers who had made at least one retail purchase in the previous 30 days. The survey was conducted from Nov. 6 to Nov. 11.

    Read on to explore how shifting perceptions of value shape purchasing decisions and why Black Friday retains much of its allure despite many shoppers’ deal fatigue.

    Nearly 2 in 5 Shoppers Noticed More Deals Events Happened This Year

    Many consumers who have shopped said there have been more sales this year than last. Among those who made retail purchases in the previous month, 38% said the number of sales events has risen. On the other hand, only 19% of these shoppers said event frequency fell from 2023 to 2024.

    However, consumers whose financial lifestyle suggests they need sales events the most are the least likely to perceive this sort of abundance. Approximately one-quarter of consumers who live paycheck to paycheck with issues paying bills perceive that the number of sales is declining, leading all financial lifestyles. Consumers who live paycheck to paycheck without difficulties are likelier to say sales are becoming more frequent — perhaps because they regularly use all of their discretionary income and monitor the deals ecosystem to maximize their spending power.

    The proliferation of sales events could devalue them. PYMNTS Intelligence data finds that 41% of shoppers say the volume of sales events makes them seem less special. Just 30% of shoppers disagree with the statement.

    Similarly, 43% of retail customers say there are too many sales now to pay attention to them all. Additionally, 39% feel they only need to shop at one big sales event to get what they need.

    In better news for merchants, 26% of retail shoppers believe the increasing number of deal events has made shoppers less likely to shop deal events overall. That means the other three-quarters think shoppers are unaffected or even enticed to shop the events more. Although the increased volume is tempering some recent shoppers’ positive feelings, that group remains in the firm minority.

    As deal events abound year-round, savvy consumers wait until the next sale to make purchases. Thirty-seven percent of shoppers say they are likelier this year than last to wait for sales to buy non-holiday gifts for others.

    Urgency does not seem to be a big factor. Shoppers are roughly equally likely to hold off until sales events to buy immediate necessities as they are to pause for nice-to-haves. Namely, 39% are somewhat or much more likely to wait this year than last to buy a product they immediately need. A roughly equal share reports being more likely to wait this year to buy products they want but do not urgently need.

    Consumers’ Feelings About Deals Events Depend on Their Financial Lifestyles

    Data shows that consumers’ financial lifestyles seem to seriously inform their reactions to these sales events. Some of the most financially stable consumers — those not living paycheck to paycheck — are falling victim to deal fatigue. Meanwhile, financially struggling consumers — those living paycheck to paycheck with difficulties paying their bills — have split feelings about sales. Some are pulling back on deals event spending to curb their purchasing overall. Others, meanwhile, are stepping up sales participation to maximize the value of their spending.

    A small but notable share of consumers not living paycheck to paycheck are pulling back on spending at deals events. Namely, 17% of these individuals shopped fewer sales or deals events this year than three years ago. Most — 55% — shopped roughly the same amount. The majority of those non-paycheck-to-paycheck consumers pulling back feel deal fatigue — that there are getting to be too many Black Friday sales.

    Data shows that 52% of financially stable consumers shopping fewer sales said deal fatigue was a key factor in their behavior change. This share is considerably higher than the 40% sample average among all consumers shopping fewer sales who said the same.

    Conversely, among the 32% of consumers living paycheck to paycheck with issues paying bills who have pulled back this year, most indicate an overall need to curb spending in response. We find 71% of these consumers cite spending cutbacks as a key reason for their choice to shop fewer deals events.

    Yet a similar share of financially struggling consumers — 31% — are shopping more deals events this year than three years ago. For these consumers, the decision tends to be much more needs-based than for their financially stable counterparts. Data shows that 35% of financially struggling consumers shopping more events say they are doing so because sales are the only way they can afford what they need. Just 20% of financially stable consumers who are shopping more deal events share the same justification.

    Meanwhile, financially stable consumers stepping up their participation in sales events are the likeliest to do so because of high-quality deals. These shoppers disproportionately said they were shopping more sales because of all the good deals to take advantage of. Similarly, they also disproportionately said they were shopping more sales because the deals are improving.

    Shoppers Are Shelling Out for Black Friday Deals

    It seems that the risk of deal fatigue is not deterring Black Friday shoppers from shelling out for the savings event. Retail customers who regularly participate in Black Friday are much more likely to amp up their spending this year than to pull back.

    We find that 41% of shoppers who participated last year and plan to participate this year expect to spend more this time. This is more than twice the 19% share expecting to spend less. Similarly, Black Friday shoppers are also twice as likely to expect to buy more items this year than fewer items. This indicates that the expected increase in spending is more than just a matter of inflation.

    Higher-earning consumers are the most likely to expect to spend more. Nearly half (46%) of Black Friday shoppers who earn more than $100,000 annually anticipate spending more this year. Among those with annual incomes of less than $50,000, 36% said the same. It seems that the consumers who expect to increase spending are those with cash to burn — a valuable demographic, of course, for merchants.

    The inverse is also somewhat true, with lower-income shoppers more likely to expect to spend less. This expectation is held by 23% of low-income Black Friday participants but only 15% of high-income participants.

    Retail shoppers planning to scale back on spending are more likely to be older or more financially constrained. Additionally, shoppers participating in fewer sales events overall this year are also the likeliest to plan to reduce Black Friday spending.

    Most Shoppers Say Black Friday Deals Do Not Strongly Influence Merchant Choice

    Merchants participate in these special deals events for traffic and publicity, common logic suggests, but the data reveals most consumers are not highly motivated by deals when choosing a merchant. Among recent shoppers, 59% are not very swayed by deals and discounts when choosing where to buy a specific product. That share holds roughly constant across different income brackets and financial lifestyles.

    Instead, it seems, other factors can be stronger drivers, leading consumers not to prioritize deals. For instance, a shopper might be more motivated by their existing loyalties, convenience and/or the desire for a specific item. As such, merchants may actually be leaving money on the table when they offer steep discounts to acquire customers.

    Read More

    PYMNTS Intelligence provides world-class coverage of the latest developing trends in retail and consumer finance. To stay up to date, subscribe to our newsletters and read our in-depth reports.

    Methodology

    This PYMNTS Intelligence exclusive report is based on a survey of 2,585 United States consumers who made retail purchases in the previous 30 days. It was conducted from Nov. 6 to Nov. 11. The report delves into consumers’ perceptions surrounding deals events as well as their expectations for their Black Friday participation. Our sample as balanced to resemble the U.S. adult population’s demographics across gender, average age and annual income.

    About

    PYMNTS INTELLIGENCE

    PYMNTS Intelligence is a leading global data and analytics platform that uses proprietary data and methods to provide actionable insights on what’s now and what’s next in payments, commerce and the digital economy. Its team of data scientists include leading economists, econometricians, survey experts, financial analysts and marketing scientists with deep experience in the application of data to the issues that define the future of the digital transformation of the global economy. This multilingual team has conducted original data collection and analysis in more than three dozen global markets for some of the world’s leading publicly traded and privately held firms.

    The PYMNTS Intelligence team that produced this report:
    Managing Director: Aitor Ortiz
    Senior Analyst: Story Edison, PhD
    Analyst: Agustina Bassi
    Writer: Carson Olshansky
    Senior Content Editor, Head of Reports: Matt Vuchichevich


    We are interested in your feedback on this report. If you have questions or comments, or if you would like to subscribe to this report, please email us at feedback@pymnts.com.

    Disclaimer

    Deal Fatigue Special may be updated periodically. While reasonable efforts are made to keep the content accurate and up to date, PYMNTS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, REGARDING THE CORRECTNESS, ACCURACY, COMPLETENESS, ADEQUACY, OR RELIABILITY OF OR THE USE OF OR RESULTS THAT MAY BE GENERATED FROM THE USE OF THE INFORMATION OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL SATISFY YOUR REQUIREMENTS OR EXPECTATIONS. THE CONTENT IS PROVIDED “AS IS” AND ON AN “AS AVAILABLE” BASIS. YOU EXPRESSLY AGREE THAT YOUR USE OF THE CONTENT IS AT YOUR SOLE RISK. PYMNTS SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY INTERRUPTIONS IN THE CONTENT THAT IS PROVIDED AND DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THE CONTENT, INCLUDING THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND NONINFRINGEMENT AND TITLE. SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WARRANTIES, AND, IN SUCH CASES, THE STATED EXCLUSIONS DO NOT APPLY. PYMNTS RESERVES THE RIGHT AND SHOULD NOT BE LIABLE SHOULD IT EXERCISE ITS RIGHT TO MODIFY, INTERRUPT, OR DISCONTINUE THE AVAILABILITY OF THE CONTENT OR ANY COMPONENT OF IT WITH OR WITHOUT NOTICE.
    PYMNTS SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, AND, IN PARTICULAR, SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, OR DAMAGES FOR LOST PROFITS, LOSS OF REVENUE, OR LOSS OF USE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THE CONTENT, WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARISE IN CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE, TORT, UNDER STATUTE, IN EQUITY, AT LAW, OR OTHERWISE, EVEN IF PYMNTS HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    SOME JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR THE LIMITATION OR EXCLUSION OF LIABILITY FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, AND IN SUCH CASES SOME OF THE ABOVE LIMITATIONS DO NOT APPLY. THE ABOVE DISCLAIMERS AND LIMITATIONS ARE PROVIDED BY PYMNTS AND ITS PARENTS, AFFILIATED AND RELATED COMPANIES, CONTRACTORS, AND SPONSORS, AND EACH OF ITS RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, MEMBERS, EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, CONTENT COMPONENT PROVIDERS, LICENSORS, AND ADVISERS.
    Components of the content original to and the compilation produced by PYMNTS is the property of PYMNTS and cannot be reproduced without its prior written permission.