As enterprise CFOs plan their budgets and strategies for 2026, they’re layering up too, with experimental sandbox pilots and full-scale production workflows built atop blockchain’s technical architecture layers.
On Monday (Sept. 22), HSBC expanded its tokenized deposit service (TDS) to include cross-border transactions, underscoring the emerging and tangible reality around what distributed ledger technology infrastructure can hold for enterprises.
Because when it comes to blockchain, the hype cycle has cooled. Regulatory policy is clarifying, and as a result real use cases are at the cusp of emerging. For CFOs, the task is clear: to cut through the jargon of layers and assess what the stack means for their own financial strategy.
The capabilities and application functions of blockchain’s four main layers may be technically complex, but the mandate for finance teams and enterprise back-office leaders is simple: work to understand them, align them with corporate priorities, and ensure that innovation isn’t on a track that outpaces governance.
See also: What Cross-Border CFOs Need to Know About Stablecoin Bridging
Advertisement: Scroll to Continue
Layered Architecture in Practice
For many corporate finance leaders, blockchain has long felt like a speculative sideshow. But for those being tasked with balancing innovation against risk, the time has come to get a grasp of blockchain’s impact across the corporate tech stack in pragmatic terms.
At a high level, when it comes to blockchain layers, Layer 0 determines the foundation, Layer 1 secures the record, Layer 2 scales the use case, Layer 3 shapes the application, and Layer 4 defines the experience.
Together, they form the architecture of a new financial infrastructure. Each determines cost structure, compliance exposure, and strategic differentiation. The question for CFOs is not whether to engage, but how to engage responsibly, strategically, and with a clear-eyed understanding of risk and reward.
Layer 0, the first blockchain layer, is the bedrock. This is the infrastructure that allows multiple blockchains to exist and interact. Think of it as the broadband network for a digital economy. Projects like Polkadot, Cosmos and Avalanche provide interoperability by enabling assets and data to move seamlessly across chains.
For enterprises, this layer matters because it can help determine scalability and vendor dependency.
Layer 1 is the most visible layer because it contains the blockchains themselves, chains like Ethereum, Solana, Bitcoin and their peers. These are the base protocols that secure and record transactions. For corporate finance, Layer 1 represents the accounting ledger itself, albeit one distributed globally. Here, CFOs can evaluate two key metrics: trust and cost.
Enterprises engaging at Layer 1 must also grapple with jurisdictional complexity. A blockchain is borderless, but corporate finance is not. Whether an asset recorded on Ethereum is recognized under IFRS or GAAP, whether staking constitutes an investment or revenue, and how digital assets appear on the balance sheet all hinge on standards that remain unsettled.
Read more: Stablecoins Face Liquidity Shakeout That Could Upend Payment Strategies
Scaling the Enterprise Use Case
If Layer 1 is the underlying ledger, Layer 2 is blockchain’s the performance boost. These solutions help make blockchains faster and cheaper by moving transactions off the main chain and then settling them back periodically. For corporate users, this is where the economics of blockchain can shift from theoretical to practical.
Consider a global supply chain network tracking invoices, customs documents, and payments. A Layer 2 solution makes running and orchestrating this complexity viable by reducing costs while maintaining security guarantees. CFOs can think of Layer 2 as the middleware of blockchain finance: not as visible as the base protocol but essential for scale. The managerial challenge, of course, can lie in vendor selection and longevity.
Layer 3 is where blockchain becomes tangible for the business user. This layer comprises decentralized applications (dApps), smart contract platforms, and industry-specific solutions. For CFOs, this is the space where blockchain intersects with ERP, treasury management, and compliance systems. It is also the layer most likely to create both competitive advantage and operational risk.
So how should CFOs prepare? First, by recognizing that blockchain adoption is not monolithic. An organization may engage at Layer 3 through a supply chain application without making direct choices at Layer 1. Others may experiment at Layer 2 for efficiency while outsourcing Layer 4 interfaces to vendors. The stack provides a vocabulary for mapping exposure and responsibility.
Taken together, the blockchain stack offers a lens through which CFOs can evaluate where their organization should play. The critical insight is that each layer carries distinct risks, costs, and strategic considerations.
The CFO is not expected to code smart contracts or evaluate cryptographic proofs. But as with cloud computing, SaaS, or even ERP before it, the CFO is expected to understand how layered infrastructure choices cascade into financial performance.
Register for the upcoming B2B PYMNTS 2025 event, “B2B.AI: The Architecture of Intelligent Money Movement,” taking place Oct. 6 to 31.
For all PYMNTS B2B coverage, subscribe to the daily B2B Newsletter.
