Sprint Faces CFPB Lawsuit Over “Cramming” Fees

The CFPB’s crusade against bill packing, wherein consumers bills are laden with charges for services they neither requested nor approved, rolls on, now with telecom provider Sprint as its target.

The nation’s third largest cell phone carrier faces charges for allowing third parties to add fees to customers’ bills when it knew those customers were likely totally unaware of those charges and would not have approved them if they had been notified.  Sprint is accused by the nation’s consumer watchdog of “turning a blind eye,” to numerous red flags.

“As the use of mobile payments grows, we will continue to hold wireless carriers accountable for illegal third-party billing,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray said.
Though the CFPB has gone after superfluous charging before, this “anti-cramming” lawsuit is a first of its kind insofar as the CFPB is now tuning in to the process of third-party charges that hitchhike on consumers’ mobile phone bills.  Carriers have an incentive to encourage these charges because they typically take a cut of the proceeds from them.  For example, in its suit against Sprint, the CFPB alleges that the phone company took in as much as 40 percent of the crammed fees.

Sprint officials disputed the allegations, saying that “we strongly disagree with (the CFPB’s) characterization of our business practices.” They further encourage customers to come forward if they feel they have been billed in error.  ​


Featured PYMNTS Study:

More than 63 percent of merchant service providers (MSPs) want to overhaul their core payment processing systems so they can up their value-added services (VAS) game. It’s tough, though, since many of these systems date back to the pre-digital era. In the January 2020 Optimizing Merchant Services Playbook, PYMNTS unpacks what 200 MSPs say is key to delivering the VAS agenda that is critical to their success.

Click to comment