The past week’s technology selloff increased pressure on the companies financing artificial intelligence’s expansion. Their latest spending plans, however, offer little evidence of an immediate retreat.
The Nasdaq fell 5.5% Thursday, Nov. 5, as borrowing costs and the prospect of restrictions on data center construction added to concerns about an AI bubble. Stocks recovered some ground Friday. The turbulence exposed uncertainty about how quickly AI investments will pay off.
Those losses reduced stock market values, rather than directly draining corporate cash balances. A sustained decline could make raising equity more expensive and increase pressure to conserve cash. It does not automatically cancel chip orders or construction contracts.
For now, the clearest guide remains the spending commitments companies outlined before the selloff.
Google parent Alphabet maintained its 2026 capital expenditure forecast of $195 billion to $205 billion in its October earnings call. CFO Anat Ashkenazi said spending would “increase significantly in 2027.” Yet Alphabet also reported negative quarterly free cash flow of $9.1 billion, illustrating the strain of building capacity ahead of anticipated returns.
Microsoft reported $45.2 billion in quarterly capital expenditures. CFO Amy Hood attributed spending below expectations to delayed capacity deliveries. The company still generated $18.6 billion in free cash flow.
“We are building against a growing book of business,” CEO Satya Nadella told analysts.
Microsoft also priced a $25 billion debt offering Oct. 29, with closing scheduled for Nov. 4. Proceeds can fund several purposes, including capital expenditures. That financing preceded Thursday’s decline and does not establish that borrowing conditions remained unchanged afterward.
Meta’s latest forecast called for $135 billion to $145 billion in annual capital expenditures. Its quarterly free cash flow was negative $2.1 billion, although CEO Mark Zuckerberg said, “Our investments are paying off, the core business is strong.” Meta said its newer AI initiatives would take longer to generate returns than investments in its established business.
SpaceX offers another example of financing arranged before the market’s latest reassessment. On Oct. 26, it announced a roughly $40 billion commitment for a lease covering Nvidia chips and related equipment. Closing remained subject to conditions, with equipment deliveries expected in the first half of 2027. The arrangement supports expansion without requiring the entire equipment bill upfront.
Investment professionals see room between continued acceleration and a spending collapse.
Tim Nyland, co-chief investment officer at Synergy Asset Management, told InvestmentNews before the midterms that he anticipated “a gradual slowdown in the AI CapEx commitment and actual spend.” His outlook allows spending to rise while its growth rate eases.
Schwab Asset Management CEO and CIO Omar Aguilar emphasized the financial strength of major AI investors, while expressing concern about their increasing reliance on debt.
Taken together, the evidence suggests three possible paths. Strong customer demand could sustain expansion despite weaker share prices. Less compelling returns could encourage companies to phase projects and prioritize products already generating revenue. More expensive financing or construction restrictions could force longer delays.
These are scenarios, rather than announced responses to Thursday’s trading. They also need not affect every company equally.
For banks, payments companies and retailers buying AI services, the practical issue is whether providers deliver promised capacity at workable prices. The next spending forecasts will help reveal whether market pressure changes deployment schedules, investment priorities or simply the explanations executives give investors.
For all PYMNTS AI coverage, subscribe to the daily AI Newsletter.
