Apple’s Handling of Roblox Draws Scrutiny From DOJ

apple, epic, roblox, doj

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is talking to Roblox and other game developers to determine whether Apple’s App Store rules are arbitrarily enforced in a way that harms competitors, The Information reported.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    During the antitrust lawsuit Epic Games v. Apple, Epic maintained that Apple showed favoritism toward Roblox, which allows users to choose from several games. When Apple’s handling of Roblox came up during the Epic trial, Roblox suddenly changed its website and App Store page and replaced the word “games” with “experiences,” according to the report. DOJ lawyers are now investigating.

    See also: Federal Judge Orders Apple to Open App Store Payments as Planned

    “Games versus experiences is a ridiculous distinction, but it’s more about Apple’s inconsistencies in applying its guidelines, which haven’t kept pace with the growth of the App Store,” Eric Seufert, a mobile app and advertising analyst, told The Information. “The guidelines don’t protect the consumer experience and are selectively enforced to protect Apple’s interest.”

    Since the Epic v. Apple trial ended in May, the DOJ has been taking a close look at central tenets that came up during the nine-month suit. Officials recently asked Roblox and app developers about the distinctions between a game and an experience, and why Roblox changed its wording.

    DOJ officials also asked if Apple’s 2019 launch of its Arcade video game subscription service had a negative effect on game developers’ ability to compete with Apple and if they had any issue with the App Store rules, three sources with knowledge of the probe told The Information.

    Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

    Read more: Apple Appeals Ruling in Antitrust Case

    Although Apple’s rule enforcement is unlikely to form the basis of an antitrust offense, if the DOJ can prove arbitrary enforcement with the ulterior motive of stifling competitors, it could be part of a larger lawsuit, according to the report.

    Apple has said that its rules that prevent competing app stores and alternate in-app payments are important to ensure product security. Its in-app payments are central to the company’s $15 billion in estimated annual profits from the App Store, about 20% of the company’s total profit, according to trial testimony.