Uber Faces $11.4M In Fines In Pennsylvania

Uber’s aggressive expansion methods just cost the company millions of dollars after a Pennsylvania regulator found it guilty of illegally operating in the state in 2014.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In a ruling, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC), which regulates taxi services, voted three-to-two in favor of imposing the $11.4 million fine on Uber — the largest the regulator has ever imposed. The fine is being levied upon the ride-hailing app company for its failure to seek authorization and provide details on its operation between Feb. and Aug. 2014.

    While the $11.4 million fine may seem gargantuan, it’s way less than the $49.9 million originally imposed by two administrative judges in an initial ruling against Uber last November. Uber, however, is still not happy.

    The San Francisco-based company now plans to appeal the ruling in the Pennsylvania state court. The company said it was “shocked” at the severity of the ruling by the PUC, when, in a similar case, Lyft was only fined $250,000, Reuters reported.

    Even some dissenting PUC commissioners couldn’t help but point out how “egregious” and unnecessarily high the fine was. Nonetheless, PUC has an example to set. John Coleman, a PUC commissioner, said imposing the fine was imperative to deter other businesses from following such illegal business practices.

    The $11.4 million fine, Coleman argued, was a solid reduction from the $49.9 million fine to reward Uber for proper compliance and the minimal complaints that have been noted since Uber was provided with a two-year experimental license early last year.

    Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

    In Uber’s argument, it says it hasn’t violated the public utility code as its service didn’t qualify as a motor carrier or broker. Such hefty fines are seen in cases involving life-threatening injuries and deaths, stated Pamela Witmer, one of the PUC’s dissenting commissioners.