Apple

Judge Delivers Temporary Victory To Each Side In Apple Vs. Epic Games

Both sides in Apple Inc. versus Epic Games Inc. could declare victory Monday night (Aug. 24) when a federal judge issued a temporary split decision.

U.S. District Court Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers for the Northern District of California ruled the global consumer electronics and computer software company can’t block the game maker from accessing Unreal Engine tools, a popular game engine developed by Epic that is used to build 3-D games on Apple platforms.

At the same time, the court denied the North Carolina game maker’s motion to restore its Fortnite game to the App Store.

“Epic Games and Apple are at liberty to litigate against each other, but their dispute should not create havoc to bystanders,” Rogers wrote in a ruling late on Monday, Reuters reported. “Apple has chosen to act severely, and by doing so, has impacted non-parties and a third-party developer ecosystem.”

The judge added even if Epic Games violated App Store’s rules, as Apple has alleged, it did not breach any contracts related to Unreal Engine.

The David vs. Goliath battle commenced earlier this month when Epic filed suit, alleging the tech giant’s practices are anti-competitive. Epic unveiled a payment platform that was crafted to bypass the App Store’s payment system and its commission, which is as high as 30 percent. The idea was to win Apple’s approval for Epic to bypass in-app purchases and allow Fortnite game players to pay it directly.

Epic alleged Apple threatened to end its account on the App Store on Thursday Monday, August 28 to retaliate against the game maker.

In response, Apple argued Epic Games violated Apple’s rules and should be prohibited from its store until the legal battle is resolved.

“Apple intends to deny Epic access to that widely available material,” according to court documents. “Without that access, Epic cannot develop future versions of the Unreal Engine for use on iOS or macOS.”

The case is being closely watched by Apple critics, who say the fees are unfair and only serve to benefit the iPhone maker’s services. It raises the question of whether Apple is violating antitrust rules.

Rogers told attorneys for both sides she will issue a temporary order soon. In addition, a hearing has been scheduled for September 28 on a longer-term solution, Bloomberg news reported.

 

——————————

LIVE PYMNTS TV OCTOBER SERIES: POWERING THE DIGITAL SHIFT – B2B PAYMENTS 2021 

Banks, corporates and even regulators now recognize the imperative to modernize — not just digitize —the infrastructures and workflows that move money and data between businesses domestically and cross-border.

Together with Visa, PYMNTS invites you to a month-long series of livestreamed programs on these issues as they reshape B2B payments. Masters of modernization share insights and answer questions during a mix of intimate fireside chats and vibrant virtual roundtables.

TRENDING RIGHT NOW