Justice Department Takes Aim At Section 230 Rules For Google, Facebook, Twitter And Other Techs

Department of Justice

The U.S. Department of Justice is reportedly ramping up its efforts to cut legal protections for internet companies, including Big Tech.

The DOJ plans to propose that Congress force titans — such as Google, Facebook and Twitter — to take more responsibility for managing content on their sites, The Wall Street Journal reports.

This comes after congressional Republicans drew up a bill that would amend Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which was enacted in the 1990s to prevent companies from being held responsible for users' content. For example, internet companies are considered to be platforms, and not held to the same standards as the press.

The law has been one of the primary cornerstones of modern internet policy. It lets big companies like Google and Facebook — along with the small fry — avoid many legal disputes.

The Republicans bill would also limit the kind of content that platforms could remove, by changing the phrase "otherwise objectionable" content in the original law to content that is "promoting self-harm, promoting terrorism, or unlawful."

Similarly, the Trump administration’s proposal encourages online platforms to actively address illicit conduct and manage content on their sites in fair and consistent ways. Trump’s interest in the latter grew after social media sites policed some of his questionable statements. In May, Twitter applied a fact-checking notice to a Trump post about voter fraud, saying it was not substantiated by the facts.

Trump and GOP lawmakers have criticized Big Tech, alleging there have been biased decisions to censor social-media posts or block certain users. Democrats, including presidential candidate Joe Biden, argue that social media platforms need to do more to curb the spread of false information and hate speech.

In other words, Republicans and Democrats do not agree on what the problem is with the social media world.

However, they do agree on targeting online platforms that facilitate criminal activity, the Journal reports. The DOJ proposal does take aim at that issue and calls for amending the 1990s law — which shields internet platforms from legal liability related to users’ actions, except in very limited circumstances.

Under the Trump plan, companies could lose legal protections if they find out about unlawful activities, but don’t restrict and report it.



The How We Shop Report, a PYMNTS collaboration with PayPal, aims to understand how consumers of all ages and incomes are shifting to shopping and paying online in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our research builds on a series of studies conducted since March, surveying more than 16,000 consumers on how their shopping habits and payments preferences are changing as the crisis continues. This report focuses on our latest survey of 2,163 respondents and examines how their increased appetite for online commerce and digital touchless methods, such as QR codes, contactless cards and digital wallets, is poised to shape the post-pandemic economy.