The AI Price War Is Great News for Consumers

Google cut its entry-level AI subscription from $7.99 to $4.99 a month this week. OpenAI is weighing significant reductions to what it charges for AI access, Reuters reported, in anticipation of similar moves from Anthropic.

The price war is real and it just reached American consumers. TechCrunch reported that Google’s move brings a price competition that had been intensifying in emerging markets directly to the U.S. Google also dropped its top-tier plan from $250 to $200 a month at its I/O conference last month.

Meta is moving in the opposite direction. The company began testing paid AI subscriptions for the first time last month, CNBC reported, with plans ranging from $7.99 to $19.99 a month.

AI companies spent two years competing on model performance. Now they are competing on price. The shift reflects a harder reality: subscriber growth has slowed and enterprises are spending more carefully.

Subsidizing the Heavy Users

The consumer price cuts sit alongside a structural problem. Anthropic’s $200 Claude Code plan gives developers 20 times the usage of its base tier. Power users on that plan can consume the equivalent of $600 to $1,500 worth of API-priced compute for a flat monthly fee, Finout found. AI companies are cutting prices at the consumer level while absorbing the cost of heavy usage at the same time.

Meta’s entry into paid subscriptions sharpens the competitive picture. The company has spent two decades building on an ad-supported, free-access model. Testing a paid AI tier signals that even Meta sees limits to what advertising alone can fund. PYMNTS reported that Meta is also considering a $199.99 premium tier for its Hatch AI agent, which would put it directly alongside Anthropic and OpenAI at the top of the market.

PYMNTS Intelligence found that more than 6 in 10 U.S. consumers used dedicated AI platforms in the past year. Among Gen Z and power users, reliance on dedicated AI platforms as a first stop for daily tasks grew 36% and 28% respectively in a single month. That acceleration in usage is exactly what makes flat-rate consumer pricing difficult to sustain.

OpenAI’s head of ChatGPT, Nick Turley, told Business Insider the era of unlimited AI may not last. “There’s no world in which pricing doesn’t significantly evolve,” he said. The compute underneath flat-rate plans does not get cheaper at the same rate subscriptions are being cut.

The Enterprise Side Runs in Reverse

The consumer pricing story runs directly counter to what is happening in enterprise AI. Per-token prices have fallen roughly 98% since 2022, The Next Web reported. Enterprise AI bills have risen by an estimated 320% over the same period. The reason is volume. Agentic AI tools multiply how many compute units a single task consumes. A simple interaction that cost roughly $0.04 in 2023 costs around $1.20 today on an agentic system, the same report noted.

PYMNTS reported that Uber’s CTO said the company’s AI coding budget was blown through well ahead of schedule. Roughly 11% of live updates to Uber’s back-end systems are now written by AI agents, up from a fraction of a percent three months earlier.

TechCrunch reported that Microsoft pulled back AI coding licenses months after rolling them out, and that J.R. Storment, executive director of the FinOps Foundation, started hearing from companies in April saying they were already three times over their full-year AI budget. One unnamed enterprise ran up a $500 million AI bill in a single month after failing to set usage limits.

The divergence between consumer and enterprise AI pricing points to the same underlying problem: Usage is growing faster than the economics are improving. On the consumer side, companies are cutting prices to add subscribers while absorbing the cost of heavy users. On the enterprise side, companies that treated AI spend like flat-rate software are discovering it bills more like utilities.