Private Credit’s New Power Shift: From Making Loans to Funding Them

lending

Highlights

Private credit is splitting between liquid funding channels and locked capital pools.

Investors are rewarding loans that can be moved, packaged or financed.

FinTech lenders face pressure to prove not just origination, but distribution.  

Private credit is entering a phase where funding access depends on how loans are financed after origination. Market signals show capital flowing to structured credit even as liquidity stress emerges in fund-based lending.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    In short, private credit is no longer a contest of who can originate loans. It is becoming a test of who can move them.

    Recent developments underscore that divide. As PYMNTS reported in recent days, Stone Ridge Asset Management told investors it would meet only 11% of redemption requests in one of its private credit funds after a wave of withdrawal demands. The fund holds consumer and small business loans from FinTech firms including Affirm, LendingClub, Upstart, Block and Stripe, suggesting that liquidity pressure is not confined to a single asset class.

    At the same time, Bank of America has warned clients about exposure to private credit by offering a basket of European financial stocks positioned against firms “most exposed to private credit shocks,” citing potential downside risk. Private capital firms such as Blue Owl and Blackstone have also seen sharp declines in market value as investor concern builds.

    Liquidity Strains Surface as Investors Pull Back

    The pressure is coming from the funding side of the market. Investors have sought to exit private credit positions in recent weeks, forcing fund managers to reconsider redemption limits and liquidity terms. When capital is tied up in fund structures, those requests cannot always be met without selling assets at unfavorable prices or delaying payouts.

    This dynamic is drawing attention from both markets and regulators. The rapid growth of private credit, limited transparency in direct lending and the growing links between funds and banks have been flagged as areas of concern. As banks provide financing and liquidity support behind the scenes, stress in private credit does not remain contained.

    Advertisement: Scroll to Continue

    What It Means for Corporate Borrowers

    For companies that rely on private credit, the shift may have ripple effects. Many borrowers are middle market firms with limited collateral, often in sectors such as software and financial services. These loans depend on cash flow performance (and not just hard assets), and recovery rates tend to be lower than in traditional lending structures.

    In the current environment, access to credit increasingly depends on how those loans can be funded after origination. Borrowers whose loans can be packaged into securitized structures or supported by institutional balance sheets are more likely to see steady access to capital. Others may face tighter terms or slower funding decisions as investors weigh liquidity risk alongside credit risk.

    A Market Growing Faster Than Its Structure

    Private credit has expanded into a roughly $2 trillion market, with expectations that it could exceed $3.5 trillion in the coming years. That growth has been supported by a network of banks, asset managers and institutional investors that provide financing behind the scenes.

    Yet that interconnection is now under closer review. Banks supply credit lines and funding facilities that allow private credit funds to operate, which means they share exposure to borrower performance even when they do not originate the loans. When liquidity tightens, that exposure can surface across multiple parts of the financial system.

    Loan sizes have also increased, often exceeding $80 million, as the Federal Reserve has noted, while many borrowers operate in sectors with limited tangible collateral. That combination raises questions about how risk is priced and how losses would be absorbed in a downturn.

    Funding Channels Are Becoming the Differentiator

    For FinTech and payments firms, private credit has become a key funding source for consumer and small business lending, with projections that such funding could grow to about $140 billion globally in the coming years.

    The emerging pattern is that capital is concentrating around credit that can be moved. Loans that can be securitized, rated or financed by banks and institutional investors continue to attract funding. Loans that remain tied to fund structures with limited liquidity face greater scrutiny.

    That shift places new emphasis on data and transparency. Real-time financial data is increasingly used to assess borrower health and detect early signs of stress, as PYMNTS has detailed, allowing lenders and investors to adjust pricing and risk exposure more quickly.

    The competitive edge is sharpening, too.  In private credit, the ability to originate loans remains necessary. The ability to fund them, and to move them through reliable channels, is becoming decisive.