Access to the Federal Reserve’s infrastructure has long been viewed as the ultimate sign of that legitimacy and reliability. It is a badge that startup payment and financial sectors like cryptocurrency have long sought for validation and first-class citizenship within the U.S. financial architecture.
The crypto world got that badge Wednesday (March 4) when Kraken Financial, the banking arm of the Kraken crypto exchange, was approved for Federal Reserve payment system access.
“Sorry about your monopoly,” Jesse Powell, co-founder and chairman of Kraken, posted on social platform X. “…We’re the bankers now.”
The decision by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City grants Kraken a limited master account, enabling direct connection to core infrastructure such as Fedwire for a one-year pilot period as a Tier 3 designated institution. By Monday (March 9), Kraken parent company Payward had already launched a tokenization-focused partnership with Nasdaq.
For crypto companies, Kraken’s approval represents the culmination of a multiyear campaign to gain direct access to the core plumbing of U.S. finance. However, it has triggered different reactions across the policy and traditional financial landscapes.
Advertisement: Scroll to Continue
Regulators are treating Kraken’s access less as a policy shift and more as a test case for a new category of “skinny” Fed accounts for FinTech and crypto institutions, while the greatest pushback has come from the banking sector and its lobbying organizations.
Read also: Crypto Meets the Fed’s Core Payments System
The Competitive Threat to Banks
The financial services sector is becoming increasingly populated with new players that perform functions that look similar to traditional banking activities. They move money, hold customer balances, facilitate transactions and provide financial services to millions of users. Yet many operate under regulatory frameworks designed for technology companies rather than banks.
Direct access to the Fed’s payment rails potentially allows an institution like Kraken to clear transactions without relying on a commercial banking partner. In practical terms, that could mean faster settlements and fewer operational bottlenecks.
If Kraken’s arrangement succeeds, similar firms, and especially those with specialized bank charters, may pursue their own Fed access and ultimately accelerate a disintermediation of banking. That is the fear of industry groups like the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA).
“Uninsured depository institutions, such as [special purpose depository institutions (SPDIs)], present substantially greater risks to the payment system than insured depository institutions, because these institutions are subject to a far less rigorous regulatory and supervisory framework,” BPI co-Head of Regulatory Affairs Paige Pidano Paridon said in a Wednesday statement.
ICBA President and CEO Rebeca Romero said in a Thursday (March 5) statement: “There are significant risks to expanding direct Fed account access to institutions that operate outside the traditional banking regulatory framework.”
At the center of these concerns is the question of regulatory asymmetry. Traditional banks operate under extensive supervisory regimes that include capital requirements, liquidity rules, deposit insurance obligations and ongoing regulatory examinations.
In their view, crypto banks could gain many of the operational advantages of traditional banks via Fed access, all without facing equal regulatory burdens.
“We see this as the first of many Federal Reserve approvals for crypto entities to obtain master accounts,” Jaret Seiberg, managing director at TD Cowen’s Washington Research Group, said in a Thursday note, The Block reported.
See also: Bank Charters Are Reshaping Who Can Compete for Consumer Deposits
A Regulatory Breakthrough for Crypto
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
Over the past decade, the boundaries between traditional finance, FinTech and crypto markets have steadily blurred. Payments networks, settlement systems and custody models are evolving as digital assets reshape expectations around speed, transparency and accessibility.
The question facing policymakers is whether the architecture of the payments system should evolve to reflect those changes. Such a shift would represent one of the most significant changes to the U.S. payments system in decades.
Sen. Cynthia Lummis, one of Washington’s prominent crypto advocates, described the decision Wednesday on X as a “watershed moment” for digital assets.
Other officials said they see it as a controlled regulatory pilot rather than a blanket endorsement of crypto banking. The limited-purpose structure excludes privileges like earning interest on reserves.
Still, allowing a crypto-linked entity into the Fed’s system raises new questions about risk management, compliance oversight and systemic exposure. Regulators must consider how digital asset firms manage liquidity, cybersecurity, operational resilience and anti-money laundering controls.
Policymakers may be testing whether a crypto-native firm can operate safely within the constraints of the regulated payments ecosystem.
“The [Kraken] has been unleashed,” Anthony Scaramucci, crypto investor, posted Wednesday on X.
For all PYMNTS digital transformation coverage, subscribe to the daily Digital Transformation Newsletter.
Add as Preferred Source
