Why the DIY KYC Model Is Facing a Fraud Reality Check

Featured image for the PYMNTS Intelligence and Trulioo May 2026 Report. PYMNTS Intelligence reports on how KYC/KYB ownership affects fraud losses, verification costs and market growth.

A collaboration between PYMNTS Intelligence and Trulioo, “Built or Bought: How KYC/KYB Ownership Shapes Risk, Cost and Growth examines how companies’ choices about identity verification ownership shape fraud risk, operating costs and growth. The report is based on a survey of 350 global firms conducted from Aug. 1-Sept. 10, 2025, and explores how firms manage know your customer and know your business operations as automated threats put more pressure on digital identity systems.

    Get the Full Story

    Complete the form to unlock this article and enjoy unlimited free access to all PYMNTS content — no additional logins required.

    yesSubscribe to our daily newsletter, PYMNTS Today.

    By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and to the sharing of your information with our sponsor, if applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions.

    The findings show that control and protection aren’t always the same thing. Firms that run identity verification fully in-house often have more visibility into threats, but they don’t always stop those threats from becoming losses. Among firms using internal teams, 78% that detected know your agent (KYA) threats reported losses. By comparison, just 44% of firms using external providers reported losses after detecting those threats.

    Cost is another major difference. Internal teams spend more per identity check than firms using outside providers. The report finds that internal teams spend an average of $26 per consumer KYC review and $51 per business KYB review, compared to $11 and $20, respectively, for external teams. Yet that higher spending doesn’t always produce better outcomes. Internal teams also report higher false positives, rising transaction declines and more instances in which untrustworthy suppliers pass verification.

    The report also makes clear that no ownership model is perfect. External teams perform better on loss prevention and customer friction, but they’re more likely to say their identity systems limit expansion into new markets. Hybrid models may offer a middle ground, combining internal expertise with outside capabilities, but they still require careful oversight and clear performance benchmarks.

    Download the Report Built or Bought: How KYC/KYB Ownership Shapes Risk, Cost and Growth

      By completing this form, you agree to receive marketing communications from PYMNTS and consent to the sharing of your information with our sponsors, where applicable, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions. Sponsors may use this information to contact you directly. You may update your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time.

      In “Built or Bought: How KYC/KYB Ownership Shapes Risk, Cost and Growth,” learn how:

      • Identity verification ownership can influence whether a detected threat becomes a financial loss.
      • Higher spending on in-house KYC and KYB may still leave firms exposed to fraud, false positives and customer friction.
      • Companies can weigh the tradeoffs between internal control, outside expertise, cost efficiency and market expansion.

      About the Report

      Built or Bought: How KYC/KYB Ownership Shapes Risk, Cost and Growth,” a collaboration between PYMNTS Intelligence and Trulioo, is based on a survey of 350 companies. The survey was conducted from Aug. 1-Sept.10, 2025. The study examines the effectiveness of digital identity systems in preventing fraud and supporting business growth.