Facing a maturation tipping point, the industry’s frontier has shifted from speculative tokens, particularly as crypto markets remain as volatile as ever, to more durable questions of blockchain infrastructure, like how value moves and settles, as well as interfaces with the existing financial system.
The past week alone underscored how quickly the race is accelerating between crypto natives and traditional financial institutions. On the crypto-native front, Circle unveiled xReserve, a new interoperability hub for stablecoins meant to serve as connective tissue across blockchains. Prediction market Kalshi selected Coinbase as the custody provider for its stablecoin payouts for tighter controls.
On the traditional finance front, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published an interpretive letter offering banks clearer authority to interact with crypto networks. Deutsche Boerse, a German stock exchange operator, started using Societe Generale’s institutional stablecoin for its settlement business. Erik Thedéen, chair of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, called for an overhaul of crypto regulations. HSBC revealed new momentum behind tokenized deposits, preparing its own rails for the on-chain future in new markets.
Behind the announcements, two potential themes are emerging to shape the battleground in this new infrastructure race, including interoperability across regulated blockchain networks and the institutionalization of stable settlement assets.
Read also: Stablecoin Orchestration Becomes New Blockchain Battleground
Advertisement: Scroll to Continue
Interoperability Is Blockchain Finance’s Biggest Hurdle to Clear
As financial institutions experiment with tokenized deposits, blockchain-based payment networks and on-chain settlement systems, they are colliding with the uncomfortable reality that digital money is only as useful as the networks it can move through.
For much of their history, crypto networks grew as isolated ecosystems, connected by improvised bridges, software that moved assets from one chain to another through wrapping, locking or synthetic representations.
Those bridges have been among the industry’s biggest points of failure. Billions of dollars have been lost to exploits, while fragmented liquidity has made it difficult for institutions to treat tokens on different chains as fungible or trustworthy.
In this landscape, proprietary walled gardens with thinly protected pathways won’t win. Institutions want blockchain infrastructure that ensures tokenized deposits, stablecoins and settlement assets behave predictably regardless of their origin. Whether through modular settlement layers, shared proofs or cross-chain messaging protocols, the industry is attempting to rebuild the internet of value as a connected archipelago, not a federation of islands.
Ultimately, banks will choose payment rails based on “the path of least resistance,” meaning the lowest barriers across risk, compliance, fraud prevention and technology migration, Himal Makwana, global head of corporate strategy at FIS, told PYMNTS in August.
Read more: The Digital Asset Dictionary: Tokenized Deposits for Payments and Treasury
Stablecoins, Tokenized Deposits and the Fight for Institutional Liquidity
Even with improved interoperability and regulatory clarity, the digital asset ecosystem cannot function without credible settlement assets, or tokens that hold stable value, operate within regulatory frameworks and are accepted by multiple counterparties. That is why some of the most interesting developments of the week came from the banking sector.
Deutsche Boerse’s decision to use SocGen’s stablecoin for settlement signals a shift. Major banks are no longer waiting for global standards. They are using each other’s tokenized liabilities today. This is a departure from earlier phases of blockchain adoption, where banks built private networks and isolated digital currencies that never achieved cross-institution utility.
HSBC’s bet on tokenized deposits adds another layer. Stablecoins are typically liabilities of private issuers backed by reserves. Tokenized deposits, by contrast, are liabilities of the bank itself, digitally native representations of bank deposits. Banks increasingly see tokenized deposits as a way to maintain relevance in a world where stablecoin issuers might otherwise capture transaction flows.
See also: The Stablecoin Debate for CFOs Isn’t Around Yield; It’s Around Plumbing
What makes this competition particularly intense is that settlement assets can determine where liquidity pools form. Once liquidity centralizes, it may be difficult to dislodge.
Underpinning it all is the single commercial reality that the value of blockchain financial infrastructure lies in removing friction, not celebrating technological complexity. The analogy of early internet protocols is one that the industry continually returns to. Users don’t choose routing paths or understand packet encoding; they type a URL, and the system handles the rest.
Blockchain financial infrastructure is racing toward that same don’t-make-me-think simplicity across the settlement layers of banks, in the treasury systems of FinTechs, and in the cross-border rails of multinational corporations.
