The cost of a delayed government payment does not end when the money finally arrives.
Every status inquiry, phone call, payment trace and reissued check represents additional work for both constituents and the agencies responsible for delivering public funds. Those administrative costs receive less attention than the financial consequences of delayed payments, yet they become part of the overall price of operating government disbursement programs.
(Register for the Sept. 30 webinar to learn how faster government disbursements can reduce payment friction and improve the constituent experience: Register now.)
That dynamic was a central finding in “The Power of Now: Moving Money at the Speed of Life: Same Payout, Different Experience With Government Disbursements,” a new report produced jointly by PYMNTS Intelligence and Visa Direct. Based on a survey of 2,323 U.S. adults who received at least one government disbursement during the previous year, the research found that delays often triggered additional activity before constituents actually received their money.
Among Generation Z constituents, more than half reported spending time checking the status of government payments, while 45% contacted a government agency regarding a disbursement issue. Rather than ending with payment initiation, the disbursement process frequently continues through follow-up inquiries that require time and resources from both sides.
Every inquiry enters an agency’s customer service workflow while constituents devote time to determining whether funds have been issued, when they will become available or whether additional action is required. The cumulative effect extends beyond the payment itself.
We’d love to be your preferred source for news.
Please add us to your preferred sources list so our news, data and interviews show up in your feed. Thanks!
The research suggested these inquiries are not primarily driven by constituents misunderstanding the process. Nearly 7 in 10 Gen Z respondents still described the process as clear and easy to understand. Instead, the friction develops after a payment has been initiated, particularly when constituents cannot determine whether funds are available or when settlement will be completed.
Friction Across Generations
Across generations, the report identified the same categories of problems, including waiting for funds to clear, uncertainty over when money will become available, delayed or lost mailed checks, identity verification or resubmission requests, and late payments. Young constituents simply encounter those issues more frequently.
Those delays ripple outward.
Constituents spend additional time monitoring payment progress, agencies field more inquiries, and administrative resources are devoted to resolving issues that arise after payments have already been authorized. Government agencies absorb the operational costs of consumer inquiries and payment resubmissions while constituents absorb the financial consequences created by delayed access to funds.
Alleviating those pain points includes expanding delivery methods that provide immediate confirmation that funds are available. The research revealed that payment methods using debit card credentials or real-time account deposits can confirm availability when funds are received, eliminating uncertainty associated with clearing delays.
The report also found that constituents increasingly prefer electronic payment options over paper checks, particularly when payments are time-sensitive. For disaster or emergency disbursements, young constituents shift toward debit card and digital wallet delivery methods that emphasize immediate availability of funds.
At PYMNTS Intelligence, we work with businesses to uncover insights that fuel intelligent, data-driven discussions on changing customer expectations, a more connected economy and the strategic shifts necessary to achieve outcomes. With rigorous research methodologies and unwavering commitment to objective quality, we offer trusted data to grow your business. As our partner, you’ll have access to our diverse team of PhDs, researchers, data analysts, number crunchers, subject matter veterans and editorial experts.
Add as Preferred Source
